Template help needed

[Dog]

i really need some templates because every war i do it is literally a replica of ww1, no tanks, just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ infantry assault waves that don't break through

[Carpathian48]

Can you build tanks? I suggest using 10 tank battalions and 8 mech as a tank division. SumZer0 has some good videos on division templates.

[Dog]

Originally posted by Carpathian48:

Can you build tanks? I suggest using 10 tank battalions and 8 mech as a tank division. SumZer0 has some good videos on division templates.

i build tanks but very late since i do not have enough production power to properly produce a ♥♥♥♥ ton of them even if i have 100 factories on em even with enough resources

thank you though

[Carpathian48]

Originally posted by Dog:

Originally posted by Carpathian48:

Can you build tanks? I suggest using 10 tank battalions and 8 mech as a tank division. SumZer0 has some good videos on division templates.

i build tanks but very late since i do not have enough production power to properly produce a ♥♥♥♥ ton of them even if i have 100 factories on em even with enough resources

thank you though

Your welcome. Alternatively you could use mountaineers as a poor man's offensive division.

[失败作PUPA]

The reaction of Chinese players is not simply because of the alternate history aspect. Mods like KR, KX, TNO, and TFR, which are even more alternative and have more bizarre changes to Chinese territory, are generally accepted by most Chinese players. Therefore, assuming that Chinese players are all viewing every issue with naive nationalist emotions is quite a mistaken and reductive perspective that ignores the essence of the problem.

The anger from Chinese players stems from the political stance subtly expressed by Paradox. Up until now, in every version of the game, no Chinese route has ever had Tibet as part of its core territory, even though Tibet is rightfully part of China. Meanwhile, the fictional India has Tibet, Xinjiang, and even Shanghai as its core territories, which is quite absurd. Not to mention, the route is called the "Silk Road Empire." Compared to China, Iran, Turkey，the historical ties of India to the Silk Road are much weaker. This creates a sense of intentionality, as if it’s a deliberate move.

Furthermore, setting aside the absurdity of having elephant units during World War II, based on the leaked information, these units seem to have capabilities far exceeding their actual historical power, which contradicts the game mechanics. If fun units are to be added, why elephants? If an alternate history route is being introduced, why does India get such an overblown and contrived boost, as if intentionally giving India cores and advantages?

In KR, Germany and the Allies can occupy all of China; in TNO, Japan has become a puppet of half of China. We can laugh these off. However, we must acknowledge that the Tibet issue is a real-world point of contention between China and India. As the actual owner of Tibetan territory, it’s absurd that we don’t get Tibet as a core, while India, which historically has never controlled Tibet, can occupy it without hesitation under an alternate history justification. Therefore, the anger from Chinese players is entirely understandable.

We are naturally welcoming of alternate content, but before diving into these alternate paths, we hope that Paradox addresses the unresolved issues regarding real-world matters. After this incident, many Chinese players reported the issue of Tibet's core status to Paradox, but the company remained indifferent. Instead, they portrayed Chinese players’ actions as a form of excessive nationalism, an unreasonable demand. This has made it hard for us to ignore the suspicion that Paradox might be guided by some ideological bias in this matter.

You may still think that Chinese players are overly sensitive and are bringing in real-world political issues, but when we uploaded a mod that allowed any country to have a Swedish core, it was quickly banned by Paradox. It seems that their stance on this issue is not as open as they appear to claim.The reason for the aggressive behavior of Chinese players this time is that our previous gentle approach did not receive a response from the authorities. Paradox ignored and blocked the viewpoints of Chinese players, and after Chinese players expressed their anger, they portrayed themselves as innocent victims being attacked by nationalistic emotions and illogical demands. This led to many people not understanding the cause of the situation, and seeing a group of angry and radical Chinese players without knowing why. I am writing this to explain the situation to players from other countries who may not understand the reasons behind our actions, because it’s easy to misunderstand the situation as it stands. I won’t urge you to join us in boycotting this update, but if you understand our reasons, I hope you can offer your understanding.

[X_DeZZie420_X]

mountaineer artillary meta can be very strong alot of buff stacking going on especially as germany and can see some very silly soft attack numbers .... its been patched from what it once was but still very strong

video for refeerance : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DmPOv4A-l0&t&pp=ygUXaG9pNCBicm9rZW4gc29mdCBhdHRhY2s%3D

[Dog]

Originally posted by X_DeZZie420_X:

mountaineer artillary meta can be very strong alot of buff stacking going on especially as germany and can see some very silly soft attack numbers .... its been patched from what it once was but still very strong

video for refeerance : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DmPOv4A-l0&t&pp=ygUXaG9pNCBicm9rZW4gc29mdCBhdHRhY2s%3D

ty sir, i'll take a look at it

[X_DeZZie420_X]

your welcome honestly his channel is a solid 10/10 for actual consumable entertaining hoi4 content :) ngl half of them be n hour of waffle ><

[Mr Cheese73]

Originally posted by 失败作PUPA:

Blah blah blah no one asked

[Dog]

Originally posted by 失败作PUPA:

The reaction of Chinese players is not simply because of the alternate history aspect. Mods like KR, KX, TNO, and TFR, which are even more alternative and have more bizarre changes to Chinese territory, are generally accepted by most Chinese players. Therefore, assuming that Chinese players are all viewing every issue with naive nationalist emotions is quite a mistaken and reductive perspective that ignores the essence of the problem.

The anger from Chinese players stems from the political stance subtly expressed by Paradox. Up until now, in every version of the game, no Chinese route has ever had Tibet as part of its core territory, even though Tibet is rightfully part of China. Meanwhile, the fictional India has Tibet, Xinjiang, and even Shanghai as its core territories, which is quite absurd. Not to mention, the route is called the "Silk Road Empire." Compared to China, Iran, Turkey，the historical ties of India to the Silk Road are much weaker. This creates a sense of intentionality, as if it’s a deliberate move.

Furthermore, setting aside the absurdity of having elephant units during World War II, based on the leaked information, these units seem to have capabilities far exceeding their actual historical power, which contradicts the game mechanics. If fun units are to be added, why elephants? If an alternate history route is being introduced, why does India get such an overblown and contrived boost, as if intentionally giving India cores and advantages?

In KR, Germany and the Allies can occupy all of China; in TNO, Japan has become a puppet of half of China. We can laugh these off. However, we must acknowledge that the Tibet issue is a real-world point of contention between China and India. As the actual owner of Tibetan territory, it’s absurd that we don’t get Tibet as a core, while India, which historically has never controlled Tibet, can occupy it without hesitation under an alternate history justification. Therefore, the anger from Chinese players is entirely understandable.

We are naturally welcoming of alternate content, but before diving into these alternate paths, we hope that Paradox addresses the unresolved issues regarding real-world matters. After this incident, many Chinese players reported the issue of Tibet's core status to Paradox, but the company remained indifferent. Instead, they portrayed Chinese players’ actions as a form of excessive nationalism, an unreasonable demand. This has made it hard for us to ignore the suspicion that Paradox might be guided by some ideological bias in this matter.

You may still think that Chinese players are overly sensitive and are bringing in real-world political issues, but when we uploaded a mod that allowed any country to have a Swedish core, it was quickly banned by Paradox. It seems that their stance on this issue is not as open as they appear to claim.The reason for the aggressive behavior of Chinese players this time is that our previous gentle approach did not receive a response from the authorities. Paradox ignored and blocked the viewpoints of Chinese players, and after Chinese players expressed their anger, they portrayed themselves as innocent victims being attacked by nationalistic emotions and illogical demands. This led to many people not understanding the cause of the situation, and seeing a group of angry and radical Chinese players without knowing why. I am writing this to explain the situation to players from other countries who may not understand the reasons behind our actions, because it’s easy to misunderstand the situation as it stands. I won’t urge you to join us in boycotting this update, but if you understand our reasons, I hope you can offer your understanding.

loll they made ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ bots for drama, anyway

thank you guys for giving me template suggestions and advice, i'd mark one of you as a topic answer but all of you are equally correct