Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you go for the latest gen x3d chips then wait till 6th April that's when the 7800x3d will launch, if not then the 5800x3d is no slouch either!
Short version.
Buy the best CPU you can afford and it will last you a long time. I have a 10 year old PC i built specifically for gaming, I have upgrading parts of it but it is still the original CPU and i haven't found a game i am interested in that i can't still play with it even if it is potentially slower than my newer machines.
If i get my benchmark software out and my stopwatch can i find differences in performance, yes...
I
f i am just playing games do i notice, for the most part no.
Would i choose single core or multicore performance?
For gaming specifically i would choose the best single core performance.
Why would i do that?
I can't think of a CPU heavy game that really uses more than one core. If there is one it is the exception to the rule rather than the standard. Some occasionally seem to do some minor tasks on other cores but the main game runs on a single core even though it is an obvious bottleneck and the most common complaint with CPU heavy games is why does it not use more than one core.
Would i choose AMD or Intel?
I would choose the best single core performance in your price bracket whichever brand it is.
Why would i do that?
Unless you are using it professionally and really pushing the CPU to it's extreme all the technical differences really means nothing. From experience with gaming, if a game is really pushing a CPU to it's extreme, to the point it is causing issues, your CPU is either outdated or if it is a modern CPU it is usually sloppy coding and no matter what CPU you have it won't be good enough...anyone remember Watchdogs?!
If you are asking a question like this, honestly you will not notice the technical differences between the brands and honestly i doubt anyone can realistically notice the difference between the brands without measuring tools.
Would i worry about P/E cores and hyperthreading (or any other fancy CPU features)?
Again specifically for gaming, i wouldn't really be concerned about most if not all fancy features.
Why wouldn't i be concerned about them?
Considering we have had multicore CPU's for nearly 20 years now and as mentioned already games developers don't actually utilise them properly, even though there are mods for some games that allow the game to utilise multithreading and it makes a huge difference so it can be done, i can't see developers utilising none standard features of CPU's anytime in the future so you are just paying extra for features that add nothing to your gaming experience and are effectively bloat.
Also worth remembering is the fact that drastic upgrade will also mean new motherboard and other components.
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ just dont reply if you don't have an answer. I really do not care.
I do not care in all honesty, HOI4 is the only game I play.
If it's pc solely for internet, basic business programs and HOI IV - then I agree with @No Waifu No Laifu 🇵🇰 regarding CPU.
Full raytrasing… go for highend Nvdia GPU… for high rasterization… AMD GPU gives best Bing for the buck in action games…
But in strategy games… buy the fastest CPU you can and at this moment it is 9800x3d!