Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The alternative is a 21 width (9 infantry, 1 artillery). Less soft attack, but better stats for everything else. It's cheaper as well, which might help if you're playing as an extremely small nation.
Unless stated otherwise if you just see two numbers like that, most commonly 7/2 and 14/4 as they were meta for years, it's referring to the number of infantry/artillery battalions in the division.
The 7/2 meta doesn't apply anymore though since terrain combat width was changed. These days a basic 9/0 works fine for defending and 9/3's are good for attacking as both 18w and 27w fit better universally than the old 20w meta does.
When you're making divisions specifically for attack/ defence like is intended then that's when more expensive divisions like 9/3's are what to make since you're only making a handful of divisions with that template not entire army groups and thus can afford the cost for the better stats. A motorised 9/3 does wonders for attacking, but you wouldn't even dream of trying to use it for your entire army.