Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
http://armawiki.zumorc.de/files/NATO/APP-6(C).pdf
https://www.loc.gov/resource/g5701s.ict21198/
[December 19, 1944], HQ Twelfth Army Group situation map.
NATO - APP-6(C) - JOINT MILITARY SYMBOLOGY, are simply standarized and adapted to modern times. But simpler symbols were used a lot of time ago, of course WWII included.
And in fact, toy soldiers are more apt for toy games or RTS games.
NATO symbols are not stupid at all, they make real sense in real life and also in good wargames or simulators, as HoI4 advertisement said: "Authentic real-time war simulation", but HoI4 now turned into RTS toy game. Æthelwulf be careful qualifying people... indeed they are not suitable for lazy people or even re-tarded.
More maps and info:
https://www.loc.gov/collections/world-war-ii-maps-military-situation-maps-from-1944-to-1945/
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=752581685