Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't even think that Hitler got a physical confrontation with anyone of his own life, He's just a little kitten in comparison. If I would have a lot of money, I would bet 100% of it on Stalin for sure !
Of course if it was just their moustaches, no contest
No, Stalin would win exactly because of paranoia forcing him to bring a hand grenade into the ring.
You think the Russian Revolution and following Civil War doesnt count as War?
If anything the personal brutality of the Russian Civil War makes the Western Front look tame by comparison.
But yes largely both Stalin and Hitler were REMFs. Stalin's youth of prison, armed robbery and gulags would have served him better in a fight than Hitler's 'art major.'
Hitler had WW1 service but that wouldn't necessarily help and as far as I know he was never directly involved in street fighting. Stalin got into loads of fights at school and was more directly involved in fighting in the early 1900's
Stalin suffered a left long injury in his left arm and was 11 years older. Hitler was a neurotic art nerd psychopath with a bundle of health issues and was a vegetarian. If they fought in 1945 Stalin would have been 66 and Hitler 56.
My money would be on Stalin with more direct experience of fighting.