Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
One binge of how to use that site later, and I have posted it in there along with the current information I have gathered in rushing through a playthrough, not changing anything aside from random events of course.
He/she doesn't mention any source for this information, but it sounds plausible and would indeed explain the results both OP and I got.
Now it would be nice to know how "early" is "too early" in this case.
It's still a bad change to the game, it's just a "surprise!" from the game designers: there is no useful or actionable information provided to the player, no strategy involved. We have to rely on meta-information to "cheat" around it.
I think the person who gave this response is mistaken. See my further comments there.
Lol, or you can use common sense and realize that : forming an agreement with the workers, and than basically instantly backtracking on it will lead to issues with said workers in a nation that has a strong industrial organized unionized workforce.