Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes
The game only has 4 political ideologies, it's alt history, get over it.
shut up ur not my m o m
True, but many Republicans in the game era fell firmly in what we might deem "paleoconservative" ideology, and are known as the "old right". They were generally anti-war, pro-tariffs, anti-immigration, largely anti-federalist, and full blown classical liberals. They were also highly opposed to Progressives and the New Deal.
It's probably the anti-immigration and anti-leftist sentiment that makes Europeans believe that Republicans of the era were somehow aligned with fascist ideology, when it couldn't be further from the truth. Part of this misconception is because Europeans in large, I have noticed, have little exposure to classical liberal thought. This is also a growing trend within the United States, of course, due to an overwhelmingly leftist academic environment.
To anyone who has studied it to any extent, there is little real difference between Fascism, National Socialism, and Communism, outside propaganda and wordplay. They're all centrally planned economies that intrude on every aspect of a citizens life, and at the core they were all founded on Marxist principles. Fascism only pretends to let people have private businesses. If you regulate everything they do, then you have control, and control is a synonym of ownerhsip. Mussolini was a full blown and lifelong communist before rejecting the globalist aspect of it. Stalin democided minorities with no hesitation, and was also more of a nationalist than a globalist.
If anything, the path to fascism should lie in the FDR route. He openly praised Mussolini and Fascism on multiple occasions, as did his advisors and many in his part. He, like Woodrow Wilson before him, was happily instituting similar Marxist systems and programs. The central bank was a pillar of Marx's plan, and the Federal Reserve was instituted in 1913 by Wilson. Progressive tax rates (another key part) was put in place shortly thereafter. FDR put in place a lot of the rest.
Progressives of the era were basically just Fascists with a different name. Even with the racial stuff.
I guess Douglas MacArthur is the Caesar of America, which makes him the president if the ideology is non-aligned or fascist. In my gameplay, MacArthur leads the Confederates (aka the Loyalists). As the Germans are on the verge of victory against USSR, he decided to take the gambit and declare war on Denmark; which resulted in him earning a wrath from Germany (particularly the Central European Alliance) as well as from the Allies (UK).
open a history book.
A cursory look at conservative/right politics vs conservative/right politics of USA vs Europe proves this. Rhetoric wise, conservative politics in USA is anti wealth redistribution policies of almost every kind, pro capatalism, etc. European conseratives, are still quite pro wealth redistribution, but are more concerned with national identity, social fabric instead. These are generalizations, but basically as malovane said. USA conservative politics are rooted in classical liberalism, unlike European.