Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
I have seen several accounts over my personal playthroughs where the AI will actually hit zero manpower and it has absolutely no effect on the divisions from my observation. Before they would run out of equipment and be easy to break but this seems to be no longer true.
Everyone wants the AI in this game to be better but I think if it comes at the cost of cheating like this, it just ruins so many aspects of the game imo. It was bad enough already that the AI doesn't follow the rules for naval invasion but this is far worse.
Did the AI cheating get ramped up to extreme levels with 1.5? It's absolutely ridiculous how these minor nations can field divisions in the blink of an eye with 300 soft attack in 1939.
I have Soviets as allies now in my game, watching their pool - it was dropping to 1M and than in jumped to 4M in matter of days, but they lost like 150 divisions (some mass disbanding on AI side? huh..) But two months later they are again more close to original numbers with both.
In long term it seems they drain manpower fair play and has to change conscription law accordingly, but saw several "jumps" like this..