Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"Just pretend it's not a problem!" Nah. I'm good. I'll stick with actually trying to get it fixed.
A good example of this is trying to set front lines that are too long. The AI is forced to have to adapt to the changing priorities of defending a front hundreds of miles long. As such, there is a tendency to have to constantly reshuffle the front.
I'm not trying to defend it, but I think you'll enjoy it more if you are more moderate in your expectation. The fact that you're already trying to micro anything suggests you're fighting against the system, rather than working with it...
Also the length of fronts is irrelevant in this case. There are 3 full sized armies defending a front that a single army can cover all but one province of, and frontlines operate off of cooperative fluidity. That one province is then covered by a different army. Then the line automatically uses excess troops to reinforce battles and, in theory, should literally never leave an opening, since units respond automatically to a tile being left vacant. Even if the unit hasn't left the province yet, a unit will automatically begin moving to that province to prevent even an hour of vacancy.
See the problem? It sounds like a flawless system because it's intended to do half of the work for you. It doesn't, and serially does absurdist things that leave the lines open. It doesn't matter how long the front is, if there is one troop per province then the AI should automatically know how to respond and act according to its own stated purpose as an order.
I don't really get whatsoever how me micro managing resources is "fighting against the system." It's covering for the system being literally conspiratorial in its efforts to find new and creative ways to sabotage the player, and is the only actual option if you don't use frontlines since no other order exists that does *ANYTHING* automatically.
I've got a thousand hours in HoI4. I'm not new, unfamiliar with fronts, the game, its mechanics, or its bugs. This bug was reported as far back as August of 2016, two months after launch. It's still here. It is still just as bad. It can and will happen to a front a single tile in width and length if you allow it.
I'm not an exception. This happens on fronts that are as small as they come. The AI does not care about length of a front, smaller doesn't make it less likely. It just makes it less likely that the enemy will flood through the gap.
If people didn't micro they would literally be allowing those gaps to get wider and wider as the AI panics and self-destructs due to the mess its made for itself.
The literal only benefit frontline has is that unlike a fallback like, it adapts to a front. Fallback lines are static and don't actually respond to changes. This isn't even terribly inconvenient. But that you have to constantly redraw the line and that units remain static no matter what means that it's not actually viable.
That's literally the problem. This isn't player fault. This isn't new. This isn't based off of front size. It will literally happen to anyone, under any circumstance given, with literally every post about this ending with a player scrambling to try fixing the massive flood and failing to most of the time.
Expecting something to not open the gates to the enemy without a shot being fired isn't a matter of expectations. I expect literally nothing from the AI and yet it still finds ways to disappoint me three years after launch.
It's literally the same thing France does, which is literally leave its borders undefended to allow for itself to be capitulated, except it's an army AI and not a national one.
You seem quite defensive for someone who makes reference to how bad you are at the game in the original post...
Anyway, that aside, maybe using the 'garrison' function would help you, particularly if they're told to focus forts, but that's only speculation. I wish you luck with your front lines for the future, all the same!
Compounding the absurdity of saying I'm defensive is that like, what, two thirds of that post is about the mechanic and how in theory it's the perfect tool when in reality it does things that make no sense under any given context/how it's not specific to me, or this situation and that the bug has been around since launch.
You more or less spoke down to me as if being bad means that I'm legitimately stupid and expecting too much when I don't actually expect anything, because the tool's been broken for 3 years, and yet it still surprises me with the creativity of some of the things it does.
You didn't really offer anything other than an extraordinarily patronizing comment. Being bad does not equate to being stupid, nor is that some kind of even real reason to act like this is a thing specific to me, my micro managing, and my expectations even though there's literally other people in the thread who have had the same issue.
Apologies, I didn't mean to offend!