democracy sucks?

[jp_360]

its has no real advantage and is not implimated very well. i mean how many wars of territoral agression and expansion has america or great britian or france fought in the 19th and 20th centurys and yet they can't declare war. and what does non aligned even mean? They droped the ball on this.

[ARY//RØK]

It's not about democracy really it's about the coming of the times. The age of imperialism is disappearing, every right minded democracy is holding on to what they have, they aren't seeking an imperialistic agenda to conquer more land. Instead they ally with other democracies and spread it to countries that do not have it. Communism and facist governments try to still be imperialist. They wage war and conquer for whatever reason they come up with, and generally the leader just has to say "okay". Generally in order to "war" as a democracy the people have to agree, at least most of them.

[↯Zindy⛦]

Originally posted by Syn:

It's not about democracy really it's about the coming of the times. The age of imperialism is disappearing, every right minded democracy is holding on to what they have, they aren't seeking an imperialistic agenda to conquer more land. Instead they ally with other democracies and spread it to countries that do not have it. Communism and facist governments try to still be imperialist. They wage war and conquer for whatever reason they come up with, and generally the leader just has to say "okay". Generally in order to "war" as a democracy the people have to agree, at least most of them.

Oh you mean like vietnam or iraq? Also that isnt the correct definition of imperialism, most imperialism is unjustified yes, but sometimes it is justified so dont just lump together imperialism with forms of government you disagree with because you think yours is superior

[Pyo-N]

Originally posted by jp_360:

its has no real advantage and is not implimated very well. i mean how many wars of territoral agression and expansion has america or great britian or france fought in the 19th and 20th centurys and yet they can't declare war. and what does non aligned even mean? They droped the ball on this.

Do Democracy sucks? yes

Too many limitations which makes it unattractive to play,
Justify war goal? you can't justify on peaceful country, and need high world tension.
Changing your recruitment and economy laws? Eh you need to war with other nation and need to be weaker than them.

Unfortunately, there isn't any improvements from Paradox regarding this issue yet.

[Viksteri]

they should rework the ideologies to mak emore ideologies and make them intersting

[󠀡󠀡]

Shame we cant be royalistic, non alligned is garbage, we need a monarchistic ideology.

[levi]

I wish countries could make DMZ’s after a war. Would make it pretty cool.

[Ëvïlnïck8 ゴゴゴ]

In general the ideology system is kinda boring.
Democracy is just boring and terrible, non-alingned means very little, and there is no meaningfull diffrence between communism and facism.
Maby add in political policies that reqeuire an certain ideology.

Since there are so many Kingdoms still in the game adding an monarchy ideology would be cool.

Also, while democraty is bad its for balance purpuses. Withouth it the Allies would be immensly powerfull.

[\Forever Alone/]

Yea dems are worst pick in game. Honestly why would you play dems when you can get free pp and unity from communism and from facist idealogy you get manpower what really small and poor nations need. Like you cannot do anything with finland outside of picking communist or facism. Also same focus tree is with iran and when you take facist tree you get 20mil troops.

But yea reason why game is so afwul because they had to make game around focuses order to break rules in game. Then sell DLC for new focuses to wanted nations and small Addons (Ripped off contect then sold to you)