安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Keyword is "in theory", maybe not in practice. I don't really know how to get my point across otherwise.
Both are offspring from a rifle design over 50 years old. Is it technically correct to refer a C7A2 as an M16A3? No, but nor is calling a marksman a sniper but people do it all the time. I would say that the latter is more grossly in error.
But that camo they have is a headache to deal with on certain maps
Look for something else, in PR with USMC vs MEC it’s the boots.
Fair enough.
We're also working with them to find the best way to assist with things like QA and deployments, so there's some good learning going on as we continue to collaborate.
Dislike the maps they are significantly in favour of canadian forces. It sucks and makes for a boring predictable match that usually results in the other team getting slaughtered over the first cap for 300 tickets.
Dislike that there is a bolt action "sniper" rifle when the development of every other faction was made to exclude such a feature. Squad over lone-beo-wolfing...?
Also, why is their camo so OP?
Also, why does their camo make them look like russians?
Also, why is it impossible for a scout car to kill the canadian lav even if pumping all shots into the back of the vehicle? Got to enjoy chasing one while my gunner poured 4 magazines into the things jackhole with no result.