Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
furthermore, aside from speed and anti fighter capability, the Syn is superior in every other way to the Osaka.
but yea I guess ill have to do with this. still kinda looks like 2 ships from 2 different factions to me.
not a big issue in any way though :)
Just food for thought :D
The official Lore is that the ATF & USC got disbanded and merged into the Terran Protectorate after the Torus Event.
The majority of All AFT Designs (Asgard, Syn, etc.) were slowly phased out until only some Asgard and Syn remained in active Duty.
The Terrans technically do not build any new AFT Ships lorewise... but they do it regardless for Game purposes.
that all makes sense now :)
also, quick quesiton:
the Syn has a long range weapon like the Asgard? :D
Well, it's like when the remaining battleships were close to retirement. Over time they looked more and more out of place within their respective Navy.