安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Valve radios were big, then transistors made them smaller and integrated circuits (silicon chips) made them smaller still but people don't listen to radios as much as they used to.
Cathode ray tube televisions started out quite small, then we had bigger plasma TVs and now massive LCD TVs at incredible sizes and resolutions. Again fewer and fewer people watch TV or live TV at least.
If the game is about the destruction of the environment then it's progress that caused it. Then again the same song can mean different things to different people, a time when you were happy or sad or perhaps it reminds of a person or the place you were when you first heard it.
Well anyway, having played the game to the end that's what the title meant to me. Maybe it's just a cool sounding name for a game. :)
Tbh I mostly played this as an abstract game, did register the earth is dead premise, but didn't really think much behind it, or link the title to the notion of progress at all.
Thank you, I can now sleep at night :D
Well that's exactly how I played it, just walking around enjoying the art and sound and not really thinking about any possible message behind the whole thing.
Then you eventually find out the artist actually intended to imprint a deep message about mankind's future and flaws, which - of course - you completely missed