Doom Slayer VS Master Chief; Who Would *Really* Win?

[Ither]

This may be an old subject of debate, however with Doom Eternal coming out I figured it relevant enough to discuss; especially after seeing the gameplay premiered at E3. So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

[Ither]

Originally posted by ...:

Originally posted by Wither:

This may be an old subject of debate, however with Doom Eternal coming out I figured it relevant enough to discuss; especially after seeing the gameplay premiered at E3. So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

Morgan Freeman or Sanus Arin

Everyone knows Morgan Freeman is God

[Soloquendi]

[PhattyPhattyBumbaLaddi]

This is an unfair fight, comparing doom eternal to the worst Halo game. I mean they are both bad asses in there own way, doom guy fights his way through demons and master chief fights his way through aliens. And there both bad asses in doing so, if you going to compare me the doom to halo game, don’t make 5

[[]]

Originally posted by Wither:

This may be an old subject of debate, however with Doom Eternal coming out I figured it relevant enough to discuss; especially after seeing the gameplay premiered at E3. So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

Theres been studies, slayers armor is waaaay better and will crush chief

[ranni]

Originally posted by TentacleFunTime:

Originally posted by Wither:

This may be an old subject of debate, however with Doom Eternal coming out I figured it relevant enough to discuss; especially after seeing the gameplay premiered at E3. So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

Theres been studies, slayers armor is waaaay better and will crush chief

Honestly, I was just trolling whenever I posted and enjoy both games and think the whole debate of which is better is stupid. Shut up and play the game.

[Torx]

Originally posted by Bradley Edward Potts:

Originally posted by TentacleFunTime:

Theres been studies, slayers armor is waaaay better and will crush chief

Honestly, I was just trolling whenever I posted and enjoy both games and think the whole debate of which is better is stupid. Shut up and play the game.

That's not the debate. The debate is about:

Originally posted by Wither:

So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

I have only limited knowledge about Halo. I only played Halo 1 on PC. And read one and half novels. And very much liked the Halo: Nightfall movie version. It's criminal that they didn't get a block buster funding. But seems it was meant to be a TV series to begin with.

Anyways, what I do know, is that Spartans are augmented. I never haven seen them to actually rip and tear through their enemies, though. Which makes me think that they don't, because they can't. If the doom slayer ever got close to one of them, they would probably die. In Doom Eternal the doom slayer crashes through a wall while shooting himself with a railgun like cannon into that wall. Sounds like a Spartan wouldn't survive that either.

And before anybody says that Doom is more fantasy then science fiction. Yes, and no to that. It's more fantasy appearing because of the simple story telling that also got a different focus. But, if I were the writer, argent energy would the fuel of incorporeal cybernetic systems. Which should make it clear why the Doom Slayer is superior to the augmentation of a Spartan. And why it can be used as an energy source to produce electricity. Obviously demons are genetically engineered.

[Sabaithal]

Kinda late here, but I assume the OP is referring to Screwattack's death battle episode? Keep in mind, in that episode it was the DOOM marine NOT the DOOM Slayer. They are two different characters with different capabilities.

Until someone shows empirical evidence to suggest they are the same, I will not assume as such.

And to answer the OP, DOOM slayer would curb stomp MC easily. I mean, he can literally rip demons and people limb from limb with his bare hands, can move faster than almost anyone in most FPS shooters omnidirectionally, and of course his arsonel is nothing to scoff at.

[[RKB]Il Saggio]

Would Doom Slayer stand a chance against the Horribly Slow Murderer with the Extremely Inefficient Weapon aka the Spoon Murderer?

[ranni]

Originally posted by Monk:

Originally posted by Bradley Edward Potts:

Honestly, I was just trolling whenever I posted and enjoy both games and think the whole debate of which is better is stupid. Shut up and play the game.

That's not the debate. The debate is about:

Originally posted by Wither:

So, I ask you: Who would win in a battle to the death between Doom Eternal Doomslayer and HALO 5 Master Chief?

I have only limited knowledge about Halo. I only played Halo 1 on PC. And read one and half novels. And very much liked the Halo: Nightfall movie version. It's criminal that they didn't get a block buster funding. But seems it was meant to be a TV series to begin with.

Anyways, what I do know, is that Spartans are augmented. I never haven seen them to actually rip and tear through their enemies, though. Which makes me think that they don't, because they can't. If the doom slayer ever got close to one of them, they would probably die. In Doom Eternal the doom slayer crashes through a wall while shooting himself with a railgun like cannon into that wall. Sounds like a Spartan wouldn't survive that either.

And before anybody says that Doom is more fantasy then science fiction. Yes, and no to that. It's more fantasy appearing because of the simple story telling that also got a different focus. But, if I were the writer, argent energy would the fuel of incorporeal cybernetic systems. Which should make it clear why the Doom Slayer is superior to the augmentation of a Spartan. And why it can be used as an energy source to produce electricity. Obviously demons are genetically engineered.

You are literally told your Mjolnir MKV is ♥♥♥♥ in Halo CE by 343 Guilty Spark, Chief's strengths are not in his armor but in the fact he is just le overpowered space marine. Doomguy and Masterchief are literally just vehicles for the player and not their own thing.

[Torx]

Originally posted by Bradley Edward Potts:

Originally posted by Monk:

That's not the debate. The debate is about:



I have only limited knowledge about Halo. I only played Halo 1 on PC. And read one and half novels. And very much liked the Halo: Nightfall movie version. It's criminal that they didn't get a block buster funding. But seems it was meant to be a TV series to begin with.

Anyways, what I do know, is that Spartans are augmented. I never haven seen them to actually rip and tear through their enemies, though. Which makes me think that they don't, because they can't. If the doom slayer ever got close to one of them, they would probably die. In Doom Eternal the doom slayer crashes through a wall while shooting himself with a railgun like cannon into that wall. Sounds like a Spartan wouldn't survive that either.

And before anybody says that Doom is more fantasy then science fiction. Yes, and no to that. It's more fantasy appearing because of the simple story telling that also got a different focus. But, if I were the writer, argent energy would the fuel of incorporeal cybernetic systems. Which should make it clear why the Doom Slayer is superior to the augmentation of a Spartan. And why it can be used as an energy source to produce electricity. Obviously demons are genetically engineered.

You are literally told your Mjolnir MKV is ♥♥♥♥ in Halo CE by 343 Guilty Spark, Chief's strengths are not in his armor but in the fact he is just le overpowered space marine. Doomguy and Masterchief are literally just vehicles for the player and not their own thing.

It's doom slayer, not doom guy. Doom guy is a normal human with some extras. The Doom slayer is supernatural.

And comparing the chief and the doom slayer on a gameplay level instead on a more realistic science fiction level. I doubt that a console game can keep up with Doom. Because it can't. Even the new PC version may be just a slow poke console game. You can not turn a console game into a PC game just by giving mouse and keyboard support. You may need to change the actual gameplay as well. Last time I checked, Halo is one of the crappy FPS games that don't even seem to do ledge climb. And they are balanced speed wise for gamepads, not mouse and keyboard in the first place.

[dmzjr]

Originally posted by TakenStew22:

There were a few threads about this debate (one of them was made by me).

Love MC, but Doom Slayer wins. Hands down.

Agreed

[ranni]

Originally posted by Monk:

Originally posted by Bradley Edward Potts:

You are literally told your Mjolnir MKV is ♥♥♥♥ in Halo CE by 343 Guilty Spark, Chief's strengths are not in his armor but in the fact he is just le overpowered space marine. Doomguy and Masterchief are literally just vehicles for the player and not their own thing.

It's doom slayer, not doom guy. Doom guy is a normal human with some extras. The Doom slayer is supernatural.

And comparing the chief and the doom slayer on a gameplay level instead on a more realistic science fiction level. I doubt that a console game can keep up with Doom. Because it can't. Even the new PC version may be just a slow poke console game. You can not turn a console game into a PC game just by giving mouse and keyboard support. You may need to change the actual gameplay as well. Last time I checked, Halo is one of the crappy FPS games that don't even seem to do ledge climb. And they are balanced speed wise for gamepads, not mouse and keyboard in the first place.

Its Doomguy you Zoomer.

[milkinaction]

Doomguy can run at 60mph indefinitely while carrying 2 shotguns a plasma gun and 3 heavy weapons plus ammo. MC doesn't even come close.

[aG| Wardog]

If you really properly read into the lore of both franchises, this comparison is laughable. MC is a badass in his own right, but he wouldn't last half a second against the Doom Slayer. Strength, speed, agility, pure aggression, etc, Doom Slayer is far more powerful in almost every regard. I might give MC the advantage in pure accuracy, because he fights more calmly, where DS is pretty much summed up as "too angry to die", but that accuracy advantage really wouldn't help MC at all when DS is so much more powerful.

[Daivexen]

marselo