Would you headcanon Nate and Nora as a swinger-couple due to how open they are to both genders and allignemnts?

[XsilverwaterX]

The romance options are pretty out there no matter how you side with each faction and their respected companions; Danse feels more comfortable with you as a BOS male, Preston somewhat going both ways on Minute, Deacon on RR female, Hancock doesn't care about that barrier long ain't Institute, McCready on anti-Institute female, Piper being bi-conflicted, Curie being bi-curious, and Cait...chems will let you do things that violate the natural order.

So, would you headcanon Nate and Nora on being open-bi, as they never sound ashamed cheating on one another?

[The Inept European]

In other words imagine if there was any sexual morality in the game. Not as an editorial set of chains but just as a way of generating some consequences and reactions over choices, and allowing some of the NPCs to express some individual variation, rather than all of them being interchangeable sex slots for the PC.

[The Inept European]

Imagine if it was *slightly harder* to romance the companions in ways contrary to their inherent sexual preferences.

I know, crazy right?

[DouglasGrave]

Publicado originalmente por Pookie101:

As bad as Bethesda has handled romances(Here are 2 pieces of firewood, lets get married) it's still better than Dragon Age Origins where you could buy your love interest presents till they fell in love and then enjoy a sex scene in the middle of camp where everyone was standing around looking awkward and apparently vowed never to speak of it again.

Yeah, people don't talk about that one time at dragon camp.

[NecroMaster]

Both Nate and Nora are just a nuclear family that happens to be bisexual just leave it at that.