安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
What is the joke about baseball and prefering the catcher position? On one level, it seems like the compound/Covenant are just making fun of the catcher position... but on another level, why would synths or humans respond in an oddball way about that question? At one point, something is said about the institute not playing baseball... which seems to be a joke against nerds, in a way: CIT is clearly Mass. Institute of Tech, a school that perhaps Bethesda thinks folks find a tad nerdy... so, is the joke about synths not knowing baseball all that well meant as a sort of dig at MIT for being nerds and not jocks, and thus programming their synths with faulty baseball knowledge?
I'm just trying to understand why baseball questions are supposedly so odd for synths.
Bear in mind, I beat the BoS final mission, so my experience with the compound/covenant is limited to just going through and finding bits of lore/holotapes... can't do some, if any, of the quests there, evidently, but have stumbled across the location and the accompanying lore.
1.Disable all their bodies
2. Don't destroy the turrets! You 'll have parts all over forever. Just disable them too and then place yours.
3. Setownership for beds etc
Of course the Covenant people lack an equivalent of the Voight-Kampff machine, which was the important part of the test, allowing to measure physiological responses to the questions that could uncover a replicant / synth.
They might have also got a copy of a G.O.A.T. test from some vault dweller and used it as a base for the S.A.F.E. test, hence the baseball questions, which are probably mostly irrelevant.
Hence the horrible rate of false positives (and the possibility that some synths might be in fact slipping through without their knowledge).
All the discussions about the baseball question seem to imply that some of the compound "scientists" might be trying to see patterns in random data... or maybe there's actually something in the standard synth memories or wiring that tends to produce some specific answers for that question more often than others (although that could possibly not work in synths with non-default memories).
Personally, particularly given the high amount of false positives, I think they're only catching synths by random chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umc9ezAyJv0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btgl3GdEj_U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQN6tRJh2Lo