Fallout 4 Metascore by players is 5.3?!

[BirdOfPray]

I think people being harsh on Bethesda. Fallout 4 is a role-playing game with fps elements which is criticized by the most of the players.. Despite this metascore mark by players, I see people liked Fallout 4 more then GTA V. Thx to Steam stats i see that Fallout 4 had more players then Dota 2 ( ) and CS:GO () for sometime and now Fallout 4 is in the 3rd most played game in the list. It is a big achievement in my opinion. I'd like to hear the community's opinion ^^

[Kris Reddish]

Free님이 먼저 게시:

ᵏᶤᵚᶤ‰님이 먼저 게시:

blame CDPR for raising the bar so high

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Anchev님이 먼저 게시:

Just TW3 fandom trying to lower the game to make TW3 looks better...

Yes, cause Fallout 4 is the better RPG

Said no one with a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ brain.

I have a brain and it is better to me, W3 is good but I do n ot have it on PC, so the better RPG is the one I can play. :P

[BirdOfPray]

Svartvadet님이 먼저 게시:

Anchev님이 먼저 게시:

Or you could rush the main and do the sides later :)

Things is I don't find many sidequests in the game. Sure I can do tasks that the faction gives me like collect that piece from that area or clear that building and so on. Those are the generic ones I mentioned with little or no backstory lore.

Have you played Skyrim? You'll find plenty more to do in that game when it comes to sidequests. The mainstory questline is only a small fraction of quests in that game. Very few sidequests are of the generic kind.

You are right about that. It's not like Skyrim not many quest like it. So it's not a big achievement as Skyrim but they did a great job after all we cannot say the side quest are not enough in my opinion when we think other games. At least side quest are not repetitive like Ac Series or FarCry...

[Ruse]

BirdOfPray님이 먼저 게시:

Svartvadet님이 먼저 게시:

Things is I don't find many sidequests in the game. Sure I can do tasks that the faction gives me like collect that piece from that area or clear that building and so on. Those are the generic ones I mentioned with little or no backstory lore.

Have you played Skyrim? You'll find plenty more to do in that game when it comes to sidequests. The mainstory questline is only a small fraction of quests in that game. Very few sidequests are of the generic kind.

You are right about that. It's not like Skyrim not many quest like it. So it's not a big achievement as Skyrim but they did a great job after all we cannot say the side quest are not enough in my opinion when we think other games. At least side quest are not repetitive like Ac Series or FarCry...

You scream Bethesda employee in all your posts. You turn a blind eye to anyone throwing facts at you. Not opinions but actual facts. You keep praising the game like it's the best thing ever. Now you just stated the game isn't filled with repetitive quests when in /FACT/ it is.

[yongbing1]

BirdOfPray님이 먼저 게시:

I think people being harsh on Bethesda. Fallout 4 is a role-playing game with fps elements which is criticized by the most of the players.. Despite this metascore mark by players, I see people liked Fallout 4 more then GTA V. Thx to Steam stats i see that Fallout 4 had more players then Dota 2 (:d2bloodseeker: :d2antimage:) and CS:GO (:csgogun:) for sometime and now Fallout 4 is in the 3rd most played game in the list. It is a big achievement in my opinion. I'd like to hear the community's opinion ^^

Metacritic has been subverted. Metacritic is no longer a valid source of information on the value of a game.Meta critic is dead.

[BirdOfPray]

Thereddish님이 먼저 게시:

Free님이 먼저 게시:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



Yes, cause Fallout 4 is the better RPG

Said no one with a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ brain.

I have a brain and it is better to me, W3 is good but I do n ot have it on PC, so the better RPG is the one I can play. :P

There's not much character custimization in W3. So it damages a good rpg. And i hate w3 when the game left me behind the reason that i didn't play w1 :/ fo4 starts from the begining not leaving you behind from story... W3 and FO4 is both superb games but i'd rather FO4 if you didn't played w1/w2..

[Mutant1988]

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout_4_quests

You know, the amount of quests look good for me.

That list isn't even complete and is missing a bunch of the settlement acquisition missions. It's also missing a bunch of the miscellaneous quests.

[Stout]

People whine and complain about nothing because they expect too much. Entitlement. Fallout 3 and NV are horrendously boring compared to F4. Other than better dialogue options 4 does everything leaps and bounds better.

[lotw_1]

Its pretty fair. You took a game that was loved by a lot of people and made it simple for the kiddos. Of coarse it would get bad scores for that. Where is the RPG elements, they are watered down to almost not there...

[Kris Reddish]

If I could not get into W2 on PC, is it worth it to buy W3? I played on a console for a short time but it was too short to tell? I still have W2 but IDK it just does not click with me. Does the combat get better? Since most of an RPG still comes down to combat.

[BirdOfPray]

Theresa Barkskin님이 먼저 게시:

BirdOfPray님이 먼저 게시:

You are right about that. It's not like Skyrim not many quest like it. So it's not a big achievement as Skyrim but they did a great job after all we cannot say the side quest are not enough in my opinion when we think other games. At least side quest are not repetitive like Ac Series or FarCry...

You scream Bethesda employee in all your posts. You turn a blind eye to anyone throwing facts at you. Not opinions but actual facts. You keep praising the game like it's the best thing ever. Now you just stated the game isn't filled with repetitive quests when in /FACT/ it is.

I hate Ubisoft for ruining my best beloved game series Assassin's Creed. So i'd like to compare every little game that ubisoft publish. I take no enjoy praising Bethesda and i ain't a bethesda employee i wish i was but the point is i loved Bethesda when they give me the real freedom in games.(skyrim and fo4 especially) and also i critisize Rogue Warrior which is published by bethesda. If you see the metascore of Rogue Warrior U'll understand me, even though i hate ubisoft, ubisoft never under-achived like Rogue Warrior.. I hope u emphatize me ^^

[DirtyButCAT]

Who cares. You either like the game or dont and move on.

[Freely]

BirdOfPray님이 먼저 게시:

Svartvadet님이 먼저 게시:

Things is I don't find many sidequests in the game. Sure I can do tasks that the faction gives me like collect that piece from that area or clear that building and so on. Those are the generic ones I mentioned with little or no backstory lore.

Have you played Skyrim? You'll find plenty more to do in that game when it comes to sidequests. The mainstory questline is only a small fraction of quests in that game. Very few sidequests are of the generic kind.

You are right about that. It's not like Skyrim not many quest like it. So it's not a big achievement as Skyrim but they did a great job after all we cannot say the side quest are not enough in my opinion when we think other games. At least side quest are not repetitive like Ac Series or FarCry...

FarCry 2 had terrible repetition, but deep down It's still a great game when approached from different angles. FarCry 3 improved upon the terrible repitition, but killed off the best written Villain in a FPS way too soon. FarCry Instincs and Evolution tried to mimic FarCry, and it didn't do so well.

FarCry 4 has the foundation, but lacks everything else.

Skyrim had horrible quest design, recycled fetch quests, and typical A to B Kill X amount of Y. The story was trash. TES has incredible lore, shame Bethesda can't actually utilize it.

Fallout 2, Tactics and NV have far more variety in quests and overall design then FO4, and Tactics main focus was on combat enounters.

Subjective, yes, but enough of sucking Bethesda off and be realistic of the situation.

[Blims!]

Theresa Barkskin님이 먼저 게시:

BirdOfPray님이 먼저 게시:

You are right about that. It's not like Skyrim not many quest like it. So it's not a big achievement as Skyrim but they did a great job after all we cannot say the side quest are not enough in my opinion when we think other games. At least side quest are not repetitive like Ac Series or FarCry...

You scream Bethesda employee in all your posts. You turn a blind eye to anyone throwing facts at you. Not opinions but actual facts. You keep praising the game like it's the best thing ever. Now you just stated the game isn't filled with repetitive quests when in /FACT/ it is.

Who me? I never stated that this is the best game ever. It's a good game but not their best. Skyrim is better. Fallout 3 and NV are better. Even old Oblivion was more fun. I have fond memories of Morrowind aswell. Only really bad game I've played from this company was Elder scrolls Online.

I wrote a long review for Fallout 4 but it's in swedish because I thought it lacked reviews in that language, but you can use a translate page for that.

If you didn't mean me then I'm sorry for the missunderstanding :P

[Mutant1988]

Free님이 먼저 게시:

FarCry Instincs

What are you talking about? Far Cry Instincts was great. It had a coherent plot, varied (Gorgeous, given the technology) vistas, solid shooting gameplay, a reasonable amount of strategy and great pacing.

[BirdOfPray]

Mutant1988님이 먼저 게시:

Free님이 먼저 게시:

FarCry Instincs

What are you talking about? Far Cry Instincts was great. It had a coherent plot, varied vistas, solid shooting gameplay, a reasonable amount of strategy and great pacing.

lel the discussions should be on Fo4 not Fc :P