Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Have you ever played Mad Max?
Its pretty tough to compare them as they are not even the same kind of game.
Well judging from the feedback of the players I get a very good impression that most players are very sceptical of what Fallout 4 has to offer. Concerning Mad Max on the other hand, I have ,ever met someone who actively played that game that had a bad experience with it. If you did play it and base your judgment on that, you will be a first for me.
- Mad Max is a better fallout game!
> Mad Max isn't an open world rpg, and restricts you from going to certain areas either due to a missing upgrade, or because the story locks you in.
- It restricts you from upgrades, and you're forced to do the story, but it's still better!
> In fallout 4, you don't have to do the story to gain any upgrades
- Mad Max has driving mechanics!
> Not one fallout game had ANY driving mechanics, quit comparing these features
- Taking an enemy base feels more fulfilling in Mad Max! All the npc's are boring and dull in fallout 4 compared to mad max, and fallout 4's a generic shooter!
> Not exactly, there's quite a few AI that have some great defined strategies, and actually work better when compared to previous fallout titles.
As for it being a generic shooter, I'm pretty sure no "shooter" game, ala Call of Duty had an actual story, and any that did wrote them terribly.... except World at War, but that was the ONLY good call of duty game.
- Mad Max is more of an adrenaline pumping experience!
> Opinion, I did enjoy the game, but was more annoyed having to go to point A, to point B and the whole game got repetitive.
Mad Max imo is a great game, but not the epitome of gaming in general, that honor is still reserved for Far Cry 4, aka as the best game of all time in my book.
"you'd be lucky to have 4 bullets"
> false statement since the game gives you enough bullets all the time, i never had problems with that, i always had bullets
"combat system much less boring than fallout"
> well this is different IMO. you press this button and than this one, there you go. It got quite repetitive and boring after a few hours while fallout offers alot more. I'm doing a melee run right now in fallout and it is so good and funny :D
"even water and fuel are things to constantly be on the lookout for"
> false statement. Everytime you need gas for something you'll find it 10 meters away from it. I literally found TONS of gas and water EVERYWHERE. In every camp and even scavenging locations have water. seriously, i never had to refuel my car. NEVER.
"taking an enemy camp is a battle of skill in MadMax"
> again not true. the fights are just button mashing. That's all you do. I had to use my brain more while playing Fallout than playing MadMax combat-wise.
"bla bla cars are awesome"
> true, the races and the car-to-car combat in MadMax is awesome. It really is, i loved it and i loved upgrading my car and destroying other cars. BUT MadMax is all about cars, the movies and the game while Fallout is completely different. There are no vehicles in FO. Only the PA but even that is not a real vehicle. A vehicle would not fit in the world and everything, the setting and lore-wise.
"storms are better in MM"
> true, they are more dangerous but since there is a hideout literally everywhere they are kinda just annoying. the first storm i witnissed was amazing: i didn't know what to do and what to expect.
After the second one i already knew what to do and how the storm reacts. I never died in a storm and i never had problems driving through a storm. I was able to drive through an entire storm without anything happening to me or my car. Still they are better than those in FO. Just some rad storms or some myst....nothing special and i just ignore them. The game throws RadAway at you all the time so why even bother hiding when a radstorm comes? Useless.
"bosses"
> don't even mention them. Every boss is the same. That is what dissapointed me the most. I wanted different bosses, i wanted some REAL combat, some new strategy every time but nope, here you go, the same boss but a different name. Sure, there are a few exceptions like race-bosses or car-to-car combat bosses but that's about it.
"story"
> funny thing, the story in MadMax was so boring i didn't even bother finishing the game. I cleared every location in MadMax but stopped doing the story missions once i unlocked every location and most of the parts for my car. It meant nothing to me. I know what you have to do near the end of the story but come on...."rip right through your heart"? That's a bit too much isn't it? But i disliked the story in both of those games, i haven't even finished the story for FO4 yet because it is so boring and predictable. I am going to do the story though, because of the factions and because of the quests you get while doing the story.
"map"
> Sure, MM has the "bigger" map but it is empty. Really empty. FOs world is filled with locations. There is so much to do while there is nothing to do in the world of MM. Sure, some ramps here and there but who cares about some ramps? The world is so huge because they want you to use your car, they wanted to make the car the main device in the game. While the map and the whole "desert" in MM looks very, very good it is just very empty at the same time. All I did was drive from location to location and it was a pain in the ass to have to drive from one end of the map to the other end because of some quests...yeah, i could have used Fast travel but i dislike using that in every open world game.
"let avalanche make fallout and bethesda is done for"
> nope. please don't. You can't just say that because they made ONE game you like. Right now they would probably make a huge map for FO but it would be empty. They would probably add vehicles and they would make boring bosses and we would have less variety in our enemies. They would make camps you would be able to "clear" and we wouldn't have as many quests as we do have right now. Please do not compare those two games and please never say something like this again.
In the end all of this is just my opinion, of course. Everything i wrote is NOT a fact and if my comment sounds somehow aggressive or ignorant than I apologize for that. All i did was stating my opinion.
And yeah, the title of this thread is just bait and first I thought that this was a troll post.