maximus wal 200 years old?

[๖ۣۜƊєสÐƤⱥŇҜ]

in fallout bomb was fall in 2077, series was in 2296, and maximus was kid when bomb fall and survive in fridge

[5n4k3d0cToR]

Publicado originalmente por Grubbs008:

This is why shows get bad reviews. Lack of comprehension.

Issue with most good 'shows that require a little bit of comprehension skills' these days imho... Folk can't follow/comprehend, so provide negative feedback etc. and shows get cancelled unfortunately...

Seems that although many shows have been 'simplified' for the masses in general, many folk still can't follow imho... A sad state of affairs with the current streaming industry imho...

[Cooperal]

I did get confused by this at one point. I already had my facts straight because obviously there was no reason to believe Maximus was 200 years younger when he hid in a fridge, but there was one conversation between him and Lucy where she asked what had happened in the last 200 years since the bombs fell and Maximus responded by saying that the bombs fell when he was a kid. It almost made it sound like the two events were one and the same.

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

Publicado originalmente por Cooperal:

I did get confused by this at one point. I already had my facts straight because obviously there was no reason to believe Maximus was 200 years younger when he hid in a fridge, but there was one conversation between him and Lucy where she asked what had happened in the last 200 years since the bombs fell and Maximus responded by saying that the bombs fell when he was a kid. It almost made it sound like the two events were one and the same.

Foreshadowing: After Lucy asks him about what happened in the last 200 years, Maximus replies that he was a child when the bombs fell which would not make any sense given his age. She later learns he was a survivor of the bombs that destroyed Shady Sands

[Wokelander]

Publicado originalmente por Cooperal:

I did get confused by this at one point. I already had my facts straight because obviously there was no reason to believe Maximus was 200 years younger when he hid in a fridge, but there was one conversation between him and Lucy where she asked what had happened in the last 200 years since the bombs fell and Maximus responded by saying that the bombs fell when he was a kid. It almost made it sound like the two events were one and the same.

The nuke that destroyed everything and everyone he ever knew and loved was probably somewhat fresher in his memory than the ones that were launched 200 years before he was born

[Piderman]

Not sure if its a good idea to post this here now, but there was an interview after the show aired in which Todd aparently dropped the hint that Shady Sands wasnt necessarily destroyed by a nuke, which may or may not also explain how Maximus survived in that Fridge...

[Elviz]

Publicado originalmente por PeaceMaker:

Publicado originalmente por potato:

there's a difference between radiation from nuclear blast and nuclear fuel

most of the radiation from a nuclear blast is obliterates in the blast, so it dissipates quickly after

the radiation in pripyat isn't from a nuclear blast, it's from a nuclear fuel leak that went into the soil and water, that's why it will be irradiated for the next 100,000+ years

There's nothing worse than someone who refuses to learn facts even when proven totally wrong. You're just digging a deeper hole. Take the L.

It's not like you're a nuclear physicist either. Another one who thinks he knows everything about a subject because he read an article for 10 min on wikepia.

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

Who gave me a Jester I am funny thanks uwu

[Mielikki Kettu]

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

well If you are really interested just read what people did write already. Personally its really not important since its a scifi series about the nuclear fallout. But just for the sake of argument I gave my knowledge into the mix.

I did, therefore I do deny your usefullness in the thread. If the knowledge was at least any good and based on reality (which is what you seem to suggest), I suggest you actually talk with the first seat survivors of the Chernobyl's incident. Since you really think that nobody can survive being literally next to the explosion and live tens of years after. Instead of your sci-fiction labeled as truth, perhaps make your own book or something where you can write whatever you want, but at least don't claim it to be factual.

I missed the sudointellectuals of steam, they always bring tears of joy and frustration.

Fun fact for all people here, if you smoke, congratulations, you are wilingly irradiating yourself or even if you eat bananas... sometimes truth is stranger then fiction.

To be frank, the entire thing at first confusing is confusing for people who expect a hand to lead them, of course Maximus said he experienced bombs when he was a kid, as from his perspective (as a character) he doesn't have to know that Lucy meant something else, he did in fact experience the explosion so its not a lie and its not rewritting of lore or bad writting. Its sign of good writting if the character doesn't explain what happened to the viewer every time when it happens (it seems to be painfully common in the western cinema)... especially if the show actually explains how it happened and what was origin and even the reason for it happening.

If you rate something not knowing it entirely (people complaining about changes in lore from 3 to 4 ignoring changes from 2 to 3 (as mostly they never played the earlier ones) or even 1 to 2... you can't keep it stagnant to a viewer that has attention span so bad that he doesn't even realize so basic things like "perspective"), you show yourself as ignorant. Especially since something like "plot twist" (for less erudite) exists. Its precisely why I do not enjoy much of the Telly today, most of it is for brainless consumption at best.

Don't get me wrong, the show has some weird bits here and there, but at least select the proper bits to bash it... not the ones you know completely nothing about.

[Mielikki Kettu]

Publicado originalmente por Piderman:

Not sure if its a good idea to post this here now, but there was an interview after the show aired in which Todd aparently dropped the hint that Shady Sands wasnt necessarily destroyed by a nuke, which may or may not also explain how Maximus survived in that Fridge...

I mean, even then there was a Japanese man who did witness both explosions, survived both as well. So, eh... its not so impossible for that to happen if history already writes it as possible, doesn't matter how likely it is.

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

Publicado originalmente por Mielikki Kettu:

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

well If you are really interested just read what people did write already. Personally its really not important since its a scifi series about the nuclear fallout. But just for the sake of argument I gave my knowledge into the mix.

I did, therefore I do deny your usefullness in the thread. If the knowledge was at least any good and based on reality (which is what you seem to suggest), I suggest you actually talk with the first seat survivors of the Chernobyl's incident. Since you really think that nobody can survive being literally next to the explosion and live tens of years after. Instead of your sci-fiction labeled as truth, perhaps make your own book or something where you can write whatever you want, but at least don't claim it to be factual.

I missed the sudointellectuals of steam, they always bring tears of joy and frustration.

Fun fact for all people here, if you smoke, congratulations, you are wilingly irradiating yourself or even if you eat bananas... sometimes truth is stranger then fiction.

To be frank, the entire thing at first confusing is confusing for people who expect a hand to lead them, of course Maximus said he experienced bombs when he was a kid, as from his perspective (as a character) he doesn't have to know that Lucy meant something else, he did in fact experience the explosion so its not a lie and its not rewritting of lore or bad writting. Its sign of good writting if the character doesn't explain what happened to the viewer every time when it happens (it seems to be painfully common in the western cinema)... especially if the show actually explains how it happened and what was origin and even the reason for it happening.

If you rate something not knowing it entirely (people complaining about changes in lore from 3 to 4 ignoring changes from 2 to 3 (as mostly they never played the earlier ones) or even 1 to 2... you can't keep it stagnant to a viewer that has attention span so bad that he doesn't even realize so basic things like "perspective"), you show yourself as ignorant. Especially since something like "plot twist" (for less erudite) exists. Its precisely why I do not enjoy much of the Telly today, most of it is for brainless consumption at best.

Don't get me wrong, the show has some weird bits here and there, but at least select the proper bits to bash it... not the ones you know completely nothing about.

okay dokey

[Mielikki Kettu]

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

okay dokey

I love when people project their traits on others, glad that you called yourself out, thank you.

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

Publicado originalmente por Mielikki Kettu:

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

okay dokey

I love when people project their traits on others, glad that you called yourself out, thank you.

welcome

[Mielikki Kettu]

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

welcome

Here, have points, you deserve for your service, have a good day.

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

Publicado originalmente por Mielikki Kettu:

Publicado originalmente por Kamikaze$X-GEN$:

welcome

Here, have points, you deserve for your service, have a good day.

thank you very much I hope you visit again sir :)

[Know Won]

Some are trying really hard to hate or complain about things they cant remember happening or didnt happen at all in the show.