We need a remake of Fallout 1 and fallout 2

[jeem9000]

Bethesda should remake 1 and 2 and they can clean up the lore to fit how they see Fallout. Fallout 1 and 2 are a bit too old now to really enjoy, a remake would be perfect to get more impactful Fallout content.

[Thermal Lance]

Last thing I need is seeing 2 of my favourite games gutted of everything that made them special. But, whatever. Not like I would even buy such a thing.

[ShadowSkill11]

There is content in those games that won't fly today. Fallout 3,4, 76 are sanitized versions of Fallout. Better of making Fallout 5.

[Hymzir]

No we don't. Those games are still fine as they are. I'd much prefer playing new games rather than seeing old ones butchered to fit modern sensibilities.

[GlorFindel1983]

No, we need Fallout 3, NV and 4 remade in Fallout 2 engine!

[ThermalHERO]

Fans of the originals would not appreciate the Bethesda remakes, they would be hollow in comparison.

[alex010300]

Not going to happen, all this will do is create more Interplay fallout fans who are very Toxic to Bethesda Fallout.

[null]

early fallout was slop, fallout 3 and after is peak (except for 76)

[Thermal Lance]

Originally posted by alex010300:

Not going to happen, all this will do is create more Interplay fallout fans who are very Toxic to Bethesda Fallout.

Like if Bethesda fans were not toxic themselves. Thanks for the laugh.

[ChuTheMan]

Originally posted by alex010300:

Not going to happen, all this will do is create more Interplay fallout fans who are very Toxic to Bethesda Fallout.

Originally posted by ThermalHERO:

Fans of the originals would not appreciate the Bethesda remakes, they would be hollow in comparison.

I think the possible profit from hundred of thousands of people would outweight the handful of angry boomers.

[darinbob]

GOG has versions with patches and update for FO1 and 2, making them much easier to run today.

[jeem9000]

Sure you can't please everybody, but the interest would be through the roof. Remakes will have a quicker turn around time than a brand new game. All the base story and core elements are already in place, all they need to do is add little bits of their own signatures here and there, and also tie into the later games and TV show as well. It's a no brainer easy win.

[alex010300]

Originally posted by Thermal Lance:

Originally posted by alex010300:

Not going to happen, all this will do is create more Interplay fallout fans who are very Toxic to Bethesda Fallout.

Like if Bethesda fans were not toxic themselves. Thanks for the laugh.

They only get Toxic because the Interplay Fans started the Toxicity first

[alex010300]

Still not going to happen, FO1 and FO2 is so lacking in details, no Voice acting and the user interface is so Alien to Bethesda's FPS of their Fallout. That it will be a complete new game development and Todd is going to prefer working on new titles in Fallout instead of doing an old script.

Fallout 3 can be done because all they need to do is add in the improve Graphics and maybe some voice acting edits.

[ULTRA]

Todd is going to be retired as hell before another real Fallout game comes out

[Tagger]

Originally posted by alex010300:

Originally posted by Thermal Lance:

Like if Bethesda fans were not toxic themselves. Thanks for the laugh.

They only get Toxic because the Interplay Fans started the Toxicity first

That tends to happen when a franchise changes company - no matter which franchise we're talking about.
Can't really avoid it.

But what you can avoid is poking at it (which you're doing).

No need to mention it or even feed it - just move on.

Really just stop, in general - be better.