Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
however I Long ago stop caring about GOTY or Game Journalist/Critics and such biased as ♥♥♥♥.
Half-Life 2 in 2004
God of War in 2005 (And 2018)
Gears of War in 2006
Bioshock in 2007
Arkham Asylum in 2009
Mass Effect in 2010
Oblivion in 2011
Just a handful of games that were outstanding for their time, however, the key difference here is that each game, while it may seem like only "one" award was available, it was offered from multiple sources which include, and is not limited to:
Destructoid
D.I.C.E (which Fallout 4 won in 2015)
IGN
Eurogamer
The Game Awards
Game Informer
GDC
Gamespot
Gamesradar
Giant Bomb
Golden Joystick Awards
With about 15 - 20 other game of the year award sources that choose candidates.
And because of that, a game can win "multiple" game of the year awards.
If we take that into consideration, then Witcher 3 won around "15" Game of The Year awards, while Fallout 4 won 2...but it still won.
"The" Game of The Year is still up to subjection, as my personal pick is still Metal Gear Solid V.
Now a days a game, be it nominated for Game of The Year is the opinion of one journalist that represents a website or company, or the company itself that thinks it deserves it.
Caviates for what determines if a game is the best that year is better determined yourself, so if you think Witcher 3 won Game of The Year in 2015 that's all fine and dandy but there were multiple "winners" instead of just one.
So basically it's a meaningless title.
It's basically the same as seeing anyone's "Top 10" list; the top ten movies as ranked by famous and respected film critic Ernest McFilmwatcher are likely to represent better quality than those chosen by random guy Joe. But, if you've previously hated everything Ernest McFilmwatcher chooses, you probably don't hold his rating in much regard, and will consider Joe's picks more valuable if he has previously given high rankings to movies you enjoyed.
Resident Evil 4 was GOTY in 2005. Almost unanimously.
Because W3 got many o' many GOTY from site no one ever reads or has heard of. The various tech blogs around the world and the copy-pastes of site like PCG or IGN, that just release the same info just on their native language site, no one bothers to check.
Quite easy.
The rest is up to taste
I guess gamers spoke.
Adamant supporters often treat their beloved games the way some parents do when confronted with the fact that their six-month-old looks like it fell onto a treadmill and got launched through a plate-glass window seconds after popping out of momma. Their kid is un-cute, but they will launch a nuke at anybody who says otherwise.
I personally enjoy F4 over W3.