Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I will have to test more. I may try to do the same thing but with BLD enabled, but no Pack attack npc edition, but before I do so, I will do more without BLD first. The problem is, there is no obvious mod issue because I could be about to go into combat, walking on the road with no enemies attacking, or, on occasion, exit an interior cell and go into the outside (this one happened in downtown). It's not like when I use a certain weapon, or if an enemy is decapitated from BLD, just relatively random and more common in the city.
https://modwat.ch/u/LaFlame
Ik SS2 is script heavy and a potential culprit, BUT, no crashes occurred at settlements or with any correlation to that mod, so I assume it isn't that one (could be a baseless assumption though).
Regardless, I could still try it out
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/45010 NPC boss battles at fallout 4
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/45085 NPC level scaling and tougher enemies
These don't necessarily add damage modifiers but they do make enemies and bosses tougher so in some sense, I suppose they do modify damage?
I also run encounter zone recalculation https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/45674
Do you think any of these has potential to conflict with better locational damage? I can't remember ALL the features of BLD, but I believe that there is one that changes level scaling or encounter zones, but I can't remember for certainty and I can't check because the mod page has been hidden.
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/12562
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/333
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/13263
apparently the author of BLD is one that misunderstands this information.
https://www.nexusmods.com/news/14538
Wich essentially states that if an author decides to delete a mod it will instead be archived no longer available as an individual mod but still available to those installing a collection that contained that mod prior to the author setting it to be deleted.
Essentially they are saying that archiving a mod to protect a collection from being unusable like so many other mods that require another mod that have since been deleted somehow "steals" their mods. They may as well insist that everyone who does not delete the mod from their computers because they removed it from nexus stole it from them.
Its a free mod sight we are not paid (outside of donations from users) for posting a mod and these are not going to be redirected to the curators just for posting the needed data for vortex to correctly install a mod saving users the headache of sorting load orders or finding what one was incompatible out of the 500 ish mods installed.
This is essentially the same type of protest that happened when we were required to ensure we had a password with a minimum number of characters for security purposes after a hacker used an account with less than six letters to get into nexus and post viruses etc.
Think about it would you use a 1-3 letter password on your bank account?
Frankly almost every other site on the internet already had that security update years before nexus implemented it after information was stolen and viruses posted in place of existing mods on the account.
So many of those protesting deleted everything as if typing a few extra letters when we post or download a mod to ensure our account is secure from being hijacked was such an inconvenience it warranted quitting nexus completely.
I have 32 mods I have written across 4 games on nexus all I saw in that article is they are going to archive any mod I decide to delete instead of actually removing it completely.
What they outlined makes it clear that all that will change is an archived copy of any mod will still be able to be downloaded through a link that is part of a collection that contains the mod so the curator of that collection will not be forced to remove the mod from their PC in order to recreate the collection with the mod removed simply because it was removed from nexus others not downloading it as part of the collection through its links will not find the removed mod on nexus.
They are not changing anything about who gets donations made to the author or the download points.
The entire protest seems to be from authors that feel if they decide for whatever reason to remove a mod from nexus that any collection that contained vortex rules for it will have to be recreated omitting their mod that the curator of a collection will have to either leave a broken unusable collection on nexus, delete the collection, or remove the mod from their PC so they can recreate the collection of vortex rules for the list of mods that remain in order to remove the deleted mod.
There are many mods that look interesting on nexus that are unusable because a mod or modders resource they require was deleted from nexus sometime after they were posted.
They remain because their authors no longer maintain them and probably do not even know the required mod was removed from nexus.
This archive process is most likely an attempt by nexus to prevent this same issue happening with collections as many curators are not going to want to remove their favorite mods just to recreate a collection because the author decided to delete it from nexus.