Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
The man you are replying to is saying you're reading too much into something that isn't there. A nice example is the name dogmeat, you posit that it is evidence of a ♥♥♥♥ joke, but the dog companion has been called dogmeat in every game so far, and the name is just meant to show that the dog is fodder (as it dies almost instantly unless you actively prevent it).
I also had to look it up as I forgot the specific reference, but the name is also a reference to a film called "A boy and his dog" (as there's a dynamic where the boy will eat the psychic dog the moment it stops being useful to him, or at least he says he will, and calls the dog dogmeat because of this.)
Like with art, the fact you drew a connection that makes sense to you doesn't magically make it anything more than a coincidence that it turned out that way.
Things like the monkey doll sitting on a rocket work independently of any reference; they're straightforward, individual, and obviously intentional from their specific positioning (the colour of the rocket doesn't matter, nor even the fact that it's a rocket at all). Here you've got a dog just happening to be somewhere that vaguely relates. He's not really doing anything special, he's just around the place.
Red Rocket itself is from previous games and Dogmeat's name a reference to "A Boy and His Dog". All you've got here is a case like a kaleidoscope where two previous elements happened to fall together in a way that looked like it fitted.
The concept art matches where they decided to put him in the game; it's not a separate fact or particularly special beyond the fact the place has a striking appearance that looks good in art.
You'd need some sign of it being more than a dog happening to be at one of several places with the same name scattered across the wasteland
You've got one preexisting random fact (Dogmeat is a dog) intersecting with another preexisting random fact (there's a fuel franchise called Red Rocket). One happening to turn up near the other is easily within the range of coincidence.
I don't particularly like the 'low-brow' level of the joke but I won't outright say something doesn't exist just because of the immaturity of it... Yes, there are also interpretations to Mad Max and other man-and-dog elements (to use your points) - but for someone to outright dismiss an obvious cultural reference is ... well I guess it's his/otherpeople's choice to ignore things, if they want.
Again, I just feel bad for DouglasGraves and people that close their minds to what is there (whether it be this pop reference or other things in life).
To each their own - and I must let others be how they wish to be - I forget that sometimes. Peace
I feel bad that you close your mind to the possibility of a coincidence, or any other reasonable alternative. Personally, I'm not exclusive, I just have different degrees of likelihood.
This simply doesn't have strong enough evidence of an intentional relationship for it to have a high probability. If some other relevant connection strengthened it, it would become more likely.
Guy's already at the stage where he's calling you (and so implying me also) pitifully stupid.
I don't think you're going to reason with him. Just a warning of course.
On a side note. I am always disappointed that members of the development teams for games do not come out and reveal the truth after a few years. There are so very many debated issues and questions that could be answered. Like, for instance, J. K. Rowling comes out and explains things about the books once in a while. Things fans have been debating. Yes, cynical me says she is just trying to stay relevant and be noticed. But the information is nice to have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjWokqBxODs