cambridge only in fallout 4?

[Asenath]

it is saying on the fallout 4 wiki that cambrdge police station only exsists in fallout 4 but I have found a few sites that say that cambridge police station is real not sure how true the sites are, site 1 http://www.cambridgema.gov/CPD/ Cambridge Police Department https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Police_Department_(Massachusetts) soas bethesda wrote on the wiki only in fallout 4, not true.

[Lucifer69]

Everything in Fallout 4 exists. The main locations that is. The thing is Boston in F4 is incredibly condensed compared to the real thing. Minus DLC Fallout 4 is just shy of 4 square miles. Real life Boston alone borders 90 square miles. This doesn't even factor in the surrounding areas like Cambridge which is 7 square miles and is nearly 6 miles outside of Boston to boot

Edit: It has a police department somewhere on 6th street. Source: I used to live in the area.

[bLaCkShAd0w]

There is a video out there somewhere where bethesda sent their dev team to tour boston for inspiration as well as taking photos of architecture for design influence as well as texture samples.

Cant find the video, But there is this comparison one;

https://youtu.be/8Kh32_elixk

[Asenath]

bLaCkShAd0w eredeti hozzászólása:

There is a video out there somewhere where bethesda sent their dev team to tour boston for inspiration as well as taking photos of architecture for design influence as well as texture samples.

Cant find the video, But there is this comparison one;

https://youtu.be/8Kh32_elixk

wow thank you for the vid in real I have only been to california and nevada,I never been to boston mass, so thank you.

[JDaremo Fireheart]

gypsyblackmore eredeti hozzászólása:

it is saying on the fallout 4 wiki that cambrdge police station only exsists in fallout 4

The wiki is referring to it only being in Fallout 4 and no other Fallout game

[Lucifer69]

Who would trust a wiki source anyways? Wiki can be edited by anyone regardless of their expertise on the subject.

Anyways this feels like kicking a horse that's already down so ignore my nonsense. Lol

[Out Of Bubblegum]

M4st3rM0dd3r eredeti hozzászólása:

Who would trust a wiki source anyways? Wiki can be edited by anyone regardless of their expertise on the subject.

So what are you going to trust instead. A youtube video? That anyone can post and spout any nonsence they want? With the wikis, if someone posts garbage, someone else will correct it soon. Because there are actually gamers that like to help and don't live to grief

Some commercial sites like IGN have guides, but they are never updated anymore. They exist to generate clicks and have superficial info. The Fallout 4 wiki does suck. But the Fallout 3 wiki is an amazing wealth of info. Anythig/everything you could know is there.

[bLaCkShAd0w]

A master modder wouldn't get far without the creation kit wiki.

Just saying

[Lucifer69]

A master modder wouldn't need the creation kit which historically was flawed so much so that it wouldn't even work. It does help streamline the process however. I never used the wiki. Never needed to. Started out early on in design and programming and only continued my pursuits.

While guides are nice and help you save on time simply playing the game is usually sufficient enough. Make a save (or several) experiment and then reload once you figure things out. The wiki often times contains flawed and opinionated information. In regards to gaming it's usually accurate enough to not matter. In many other areas it's a wasted effort.

[bLaCkShAd0w]

You would need it for scripting, As its a custom written language by Bethesda, And the only official reference to it is on that wiki. Unless your so good you've devised ways to learn unknown languages without any reference, But I doubt it.

Same goes with script extender refrences, Their only library is on that same wiki. So you see, There might be some people you can BS on these forums, But I'm not one of them.

[Lucifer69]

Papyrus isn't anything special. The libraries for said languages on the wiki didn't always exist and when they were first added they were horribly inaccurate. From what I've bothered to read it's seems mostly reliable but I still don't like an encyclopedia of sorts that can be freely edited by anyone at any time.

Off topic and said post was answered anyways.