Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Effectively a No True Scotsman argument...
Do you actually have anything to support your claims, beyond logical fallacy?
As Dr Dro said, cut content is not canon... It doesn't matter what might have been, it was removed and is therefore not official - it is "extended universe" at best, and is not official canon...
What you're describing here is an abridged version of a story, which is very different from official events...
If you don't , then they are not good.
Is this not what even democratically elected governments do today anyway?
yes, but look at it this way, both of you are shoving words into my mouth that I never said . I never stated that he did in fact killed Lyons to gain Elder rank but my specific meaning was "might have" which means you are siding with a group of people who think I did say Maxson killed Lyons. I hope you can now see after this clarification. So yes, it is group think, and Dr. D was making a straw man to begin with.
FONV does have a codex record mentioning the first Maxson and the beginings of the brother hood ... I would start by looking there.
Strawmanning is actively misrepresenting someone's comments... Though you keep using weasel words that Maxson "might" have killed Sarah Lyons, you insist on reiterating this fantasy... Dro didn't straw Man there at all...
Once again claiming sharing similar beliefs to automatically qualify as group think is indeed strawmanning, else you're using the term group think without fully understanding it's true meaning...
In this you are correct, but those entries are minimal and intentionally vague and as such they only touch on major events...
They do not confirm either narrative in their entirety, which is what we've been saying - only significant events are considered canon in Tactics, and we don't even know which (of three possible) ending is canon as Bethesda have never confirmed it...
Yep, all official canon...
well, yes my comments to the main topic of "BOS morallity" has been misrepresented by Dr. D. and now that you mention it this way I can tell you must have sided with his arguement by mistake?