Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Though I would still play the games in order if nothing else just to see all this series has to offer. By starting off with Ds3, if you ever want to see what the other two games are like you're going to just see gameplay downgrades effectively.
If you still want to know what is happening in story and whatnot, check on YouTube, some YouTubers have a really good content that covers everything with actual facts in-game and some solid theories to back them all up.
But no, it won't really matter which one you start with story-wise. Mechanic-wise you might have complaints going from new to old, if you're one of those people that finds that very grating (some of DS1's mechanics feel like complete junk after you play 2 or 3).
Most of the story is very arcane. It's not really narrative-driven, and you pick up most pieces of it through like item descriptions and stuff.
Start with Ds1 then play through it in the order of the trilogy. Ignore what people try to tell you about the games. Just make your own opinion of them and decide which games are your favorite. I personally love Ds1 & Ds2 over Ds3. Doesn't mean you will as well.
THis. Even the idea of calling certain things "quests" bugs me. Most aren't quests, you haven't been asked to do anything in regards to them, it's just events turning out one way or another based on what you do. Why it bugs me when people complain about things like "There was nothing telling me that was a quest, why did (insert person here) die?" Well, that's because it wasn't a quest, it's just the largely arbitrary results of your choices. Didn't happen to stumble across the guy in the well because, well, why would you? Turns out that can end up leading to someone's death but there's nothing like a narrative line behind it.
Either way, what is there is kind of a running storyline. While Ds3 is much more heavily dependant on Ds1 knowledge, you still need some knowledge of events to even understand what's going on in Ds2 (the abyssal queens like Nashandra, the great souls. the throne of want/kiln, ect).
Ok so the gameplay is similar to ds 3 ? Doesnt look like it from what I have seen. I have seen multiple playthroughs of it so I got the lore from it that way,
I started with DS1 and fell in love with it. I tried tolike ds2 but something was just missing. The intensity wasn't there, level design wasn;t there, played about 1/3 of the way through and uninstalled. Picked up DS3 and loved it.
Having said that, I'm not sure I would love DS1 as much if I started with DS3. It was released in what, 2011? And its age shows. Went back when remastered came out, and after the fluidity of the mechanics in DS3 it felt clunky.
I do wish they had resolved the poise issue better tho... sure it was too much in DS1, but in DS3 it's the opposite problem: a guy in full plate armor gets stumbled by a whip, seriously?