Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A normal fight that last 10 - 15 turns, those target don't die until everyone else is dead. So they get to annoy you for 10- 15 turns. Sometime really wracking your team, it is a huge relive when they die in turn 3 - 5.
Check the HH part.
It used to be bad when missing the attack will consume the HH stack. But now it's a reliable perk to builds that want the headshots.
I wanted to see how it would play out with as many weapon specs as I could build around. In the past, Hammers have always been the best in my opinion. We will see once the map is cleared though!
In my experience Bullseye is far from a dumb perk on an archer, for the very reason you mention. I cannot count the number of times I've taken out necros and hexen on turn 2 even not using aimed shot. I know the number crunchers disagree with me, but it's how the game plays with tactics I use which matters to me, and that experience over many runs simply suggest BE on a dedicated archer.
Some even go so far as to believe shooting at covered targets is tantamount to spraying and praying - not in my experience at all. To bring down pesky goblin priests and overlords, those ones with spiked impalers, BE seems to help more often than not. So many people complaining about how difficult necros, hexen and goblin backliners are simply don't try to hit with a BE dedicated archer simply because the guides and number-crunchers all preach that it's not worth the trouble. Perhaps they should try it some time.
However, I tend to use OW XBows switching to handgonnes when available rather than a lot of dedicated archers, and as these tend to have a lower Ratk than a dedicated archer, I tend to switch BE out for something more tactically useful such as throwing mastery.
And yes HH can be useful on random ranged head hits but I do tend to keep it back for brutes, and they tend to use flails or polearms anyway. The one time I did put it on an archer he tended to hit with it more often when he switched to polearm (his Matk was as high as his Ratk so there seemed some logic to it). In some ways putting HH on ranged is probably more like spraying and praying than BE.
Ignore the number crunchers. So many people just follow the 'Do this to be the leetest' guides, which is literally all they are. The best possible choices to min/max everything in every way.
Brah. No. N. O. There is so much not fun in doing that. Do what you want. Do what you like. Take whatever perks you think are cool and work for what you want to do.