Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Paid Lootboxes is the issue here, don't let Ubisoft off the hook
Just because they dangle a free Elite skin in your face, somehow its all forgiven now. Heck no.

And before people say "cosmetics don't matter, they don't affect gameplay", then to you I say this issue doesn't affect you so your opinion is invalid and ignored.

This is for people who enjoy buying cosmetics. Now they put the new cosmetics in a paid lootbox to get people to spend money on them until they get what they want.
Naposledy upravil Razin_Shah; 27. led. 2018 v 20.55
< >
Zobrazeno 91105 z 510 komentářů
Its just business
Redgrave původně napsal:
Its just business
Hi! Yep we know it's just part of bussiness and of course they need to make profit. But i thinked in a idea where everyone wins! Except for the people who tend to "gamble", they're the comments #78 and #88 in this thread, can you provide me feed back about them?
I will write here a TL:DR version of it in a few secs.

Edit: Here's the TL:DR.

Basically ubisoft makes 100% profit out of this by adding a option to buy each cosmetic* separetly or in a bundle of R6 credits, keeping the loot boxes to "lure" gamblers, adding a way to farm them by a "profitable reown amount" for them, and finally making a discount in everything the last week of the event ala "hot sale".
* I'm refering to the "outbreak pack collection skins*.
Naposledy upravil Uncle Sam; 28. led. 2018 v 0.16
all i hear is how bad lootboxes here, want to make them stop. stop buying them, i still dont see whats wrong with a company whose sole purpose is to make money, have lootboxes. as long as lootboxes dont give advantages to those who pay vs those who dont
Lueen88 původně napsal:
all i hear is how bad lootboxes here, want to make them stop. stop buying them, i still dont see whats wrong with a company whose sole purpose is to make money, have lootboxes. as long as lootboxes dont give advantages to those who pay vs those who dont
Indeed we can vote with our wallets as we should do! But i just thinked in a idea where everybody wins, except for the "gamblers". My idea are the comments #78 and #88 in this thread, can you provide feed back on them, please? Thanks in advance!
The TL:DR of my ideas is :
Basically ubisoft makes 100% profit out of this by adding a option to buy each cosmetic* separetly or in a bundle of R6 credits, keeping the loot boxes to "lure" gamblers, adding a way to farm them by a "profitable reown amount" for them, and finally making a discount in everything the last week of the event ala "hot sale".
* I'm refering to the "outbreak pack collection skins*.
Which i just posted in the comment #96 of this thread.
So do you think it's a good or a bad idea?
who cares, it's cosmetics. getgudkiddos.
Mops TENTACLE BOSS původně napsal:
Tengku_Razin původně napsal:
Just because they dangle a free Elite skin in your face, somehow its all forgiven now. Heck no.

And before people say "cosmetics don't matter, they don't affect gameplay", then to you I say this issue doesn't affect you so your opinion is invalid and ignored.

This is for people who enjoy buying cosmetics. Now they put the new cosmetics in a paid lootbox to get people to spend money on them until they get what they want.

THANK YOU. Holy ♥♥♥♥, I was getting so sick of the only posts being people saying "it's cosmetic, who cares if they're injecting gambling into a game where previously you could straight up buy anything you wanted. That has no negative impact whatsoever. Ubisoft are poor after all and need the money really badly so we just have to accept it guys. :(((("
Hi mate! Can you read the comment #98 in this thread and give me feedbacks of the TL:DR version of my idea to solve the loot box issue? It's a good or bad idea? I'm open to suggestions also thanks in advance for any feedback!
Mr.foster(S.A.S) původně napsal:
Lueen88 původně napsal:
all i hear is how bad lootboxes here, want to make them stop. stop buying them, i still dont see whats wrong with a company whose sole purpose is to make money, have lootboxes. as long as lootboxes dont give advantages to those who pay vs those who dont
Indeed we can vote with our wallets as we should do! But i just thinked in a idea where everybody wins, except for the "gamblers". My idea are the comments #78 and #88 in this thread, can you provide feed back on them, please? Thanks in advance!
The TL:DR of my ideas is :
Basically ubisoft makes 100% profit out of this by adding a option to buy each cosmetic* separetly or in a bundle of R6 credits, keeping the loot boxes to "lure" gamblers, adding a way to farm them by a "profitable reown amount" for them, and finally making a discount in everything the last week of the event ala "hot sale".
* I'm refering to the "outbreak pack collection skins*.
Which i just posted in the comment #96 of this thread.
So do you think it's a good or a bad idea?
you got lots of good points but to be honest, them allowing for all people to get an Ash elite skin is the furthest they will go. its a incredibly low chance that they are going to do this. Plus I think its quite reasonable since the skins are obviously unique to the other elite ones. It be understandable if the Zombie Gamemode costs money to play. but cosmetics is the least of our problems
Naposledy upravil Max; 28. led. 2018 v 0.41
Syncroniam původně napsal:
who cares, it's cosmetics. getgudkiddos.
saying everyone is a kid doesn't look more mature
Mops TENTACLE BOSS původně napsal:
Syncroniam původně napsal:
who cares, it's cosmetics. getgudkiddos.

"hurr durr its just fragmented paid content, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr it was free to unlock before but I don't care, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $5 a pop, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $5 a pop for rng, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its only 5% stronger, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $10 a pop for rng, getgudkiddos.
"hurr durr, it's just one map, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just time limited play, getgudkiddos."

I care.

Yes thank you for posting a slippery sloap fallacy.
Mops TENTACLE BOSS původně napsal:
Syncroniam původně napsal:
who cares, it's cosmetics. getgudkiddos.

"hurr durr its just fragmented paid content, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr it was free to unlock before but I don't care, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $5 a pop, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $5 a pop for rng, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its only 5% stronger, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just $10 a pop for rng, getgudkiddos.
"hurr durr, it's just one map, getgudkiddos."
"hurr durr its just time limited play, getgudkiddos."

I care.
did you actually get triggered and type all that up? geez.
Syncroniam původně napsal:
who cares, it's cosmetics. getgudkiddos.
Hello there, well if it's "just cosmetic" why they can just give it away for "free"? Because they want to make profit of course, and that's perfect since that's the objective of a company.
Anyways I thinked about in a solution to this "loot box issue", the TL:DR version of it it's on the comment #98 of this thread, could you give me feedback on it, please? It's a good or bad idea? I'm open to suggestions on it! Also thanks in advance for any feedback.
„Paid Lootboxes is the issue here, don't let Ubisoft off the hook“ - I dont ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ understand what is problem with you people.. One big example is cs:go but nobody bats an eye there about it.
PLEASE stop creating drama
sadlief původně napsal:
Mr.foster(S.A.S) původně napsal:
Indeed we can vote with our wallets as we should do! But i just thinked in a idea where everybody wins, except for the "gamblers". My idea are the comments #78 and #88 in this thread, can you provide feed back on them, please? Thanks in advance!
The TL:DR of my ideas is :
Basically ubisoft makes 100% profit out of this by adding a option to buy each cosmetic* separetly or in a bundle of R6 credits, keeping the loot boxes to "lure" gamblers, adding a way to farm them by a "profitable reown amount" for them, and finally making a discount in everything the last week of the event ala "hot sale".
* I'm refering to the "outbreak pack collection skins*.
Which i just posted in the comment #96 of this thread.
So do you think it's a good or a bad idea?
you got lots of good points but to be honest, them allowing for all people to get an Ash elite skin is the furthest they will go. its a incredibly low chance that they are going to do this. Plus I think its quite reasonable since the skins are obviously unique to the other elite ones. It be understandable if the Zombie Gamemode costs money to play. but cosmetics is the least of our problems
Well you got good points, but Imo use the free elite skin as "bait" to calm everyone on reddit was a mistake. Now they can't fall back on it without a major back fire. And I agree it being cosmetic is a minor problem, the thing is I as a customer like to support a company / devs if they deserve it & there isn't any ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ disgusting paid RNG loot boxes in the middle.
For that reason I thinked in this idea so "everyone" wins except for the gamblers.
After all if this event is successful they can keep good "PR", happy customers and a nice profit out of it, and possible future events!
Scar- BBmainAndProud původně napsal:
„Paid Lootboxes is the issue here, don't let Ubisoft off the hook“ - I dont ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ understand what is problem with you people.. One big example is cs:go but nobody bats an eye there about it.
PLEASE stop creating drama
Hello! Instead if making "drama", I just thinked in a idea how to resolve this "loot box" issue with everyone winning, except for the gamblers.
The TL:DR version of it it's on the comments #96 of this thread could you provide me feedback please? It's a good or bad idea? Thanks in advance for any further feedback! I'm open to suggestions.
Looking for another ban there buddy?

Full stop, you seriously sound like Sir Ben. You might want to go ask him how that turned out for him
< >
Zobrazeno 91105 z 510 komentářů
Na stránku: 1530 50

Datum zveřejnění: 27. led. 2018 v 20.54
Počet příspěvků: 507