Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The reason they were strong and picked most of the time was not because of the ACOGs, rather, a combination of good gadgets, good primaries (that can equip ACOG), fast speed, and effectiveness of spawn peeking is what made them good. The issue is that they're good when other defenders aren't as well off. IMO they should keep the ACOGs but add the ACOGs to "other" Defenders (like Tachanka!).
Stop nerfing and start buffing for crying out loud... At the same time, Goobisoft thinks balancing is based on charts/statistics rather than intuitive knowledge from experinced players.