Автор сообщения: Zabíjim Kretény wildcase.com

BUT DEVELOPERS SOLD ME GAME, THAT FITTED MY HW AND THATS WHY I BOUGHT IT!!!! I have rarely enough money to buy game, not mentioning HW. So they took my money, and now i wont be able to play for my money anymore, because of Devs problems that are not my problems. You get it? Thats stealing...One of few games that i could enjoy is gone, with "screw your problems" as message. I feel very bad....

Your inability to predict an obvious increase in processing power needed to run new graphics and system is your own fault. Refund the DLC and keep playing the game you paid for, which is Horizons.

You obviously do not understand my problem...i bought Elite (fine), Horizons (fine), not bought Odyssey (from obvious reasons) and i will be forced to have min. req. for odyssey anywaya......THAT is my problem...

Автор сообщения: LazyMacro

Well what can i say... a brand new dlc for a 5 year old game wich never came out of its development phase. First you released Horizons (Which is now completely included in the vannila game - WOW what a kick in the face) with a lot of promises. Now you are going to release what?.I porbally will wait untill your next DLC so this one is going to be included too or a better idea i will never play one of your games again.

ITT: Entitled manchild who wants to gatekeep and stay in his own bubble of what Elite: Dangerous apparently is.

You bought for Horizons to enjoy access the additional content that was being delivered while it was in development through the years and down the line. And you've probably had your time already measured and spent in accordance with your purchase through the last 5 years. What's the problem of releasing it free years later?

The maximum required, so close, just SO CLOSE, that's almost everything I need, but my RX580 has 4 GB, not 8. Sadness

Can someone from the Dev team (if they read this anyway) define on what quality min and recommended specs mean?
For example min is for 30fps 720p medium/low quality?
Recommended for 60fps 1080p/2k medium/high?

I don't see the reason behind all this increase of specs anyway... It's more like they force it for nvidia and amd to have a reason to exist...

Does it require an additional 75 GB on top of what Horizons already takes up? Or is the required storage space the total for the whole package?

Interesting to see that the some of the most currently used cards can't meet these requirements:
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

Автор сообщения: Scorp18

Can someone from the Dev team (if they read this anyway) define on what quality min and recommended specs mean?

From their specs FAQ:

EXPECTED PERFORMANCE

Our minimum requirements aim to produce a minimum of 30 frames-per-second at 720p (1280x720).

Our recommended requirements aim to produce an average of 60 frames-per-second at 1080p (1920x1080). This may fluctuate in more intensive areas and on planets (Horizons-only)

If those specs were in Alpha, this "Beta" called Odyssey, will probably be the same... Based on my hardware so far, I can smell a new GPU in 5 days, though, it's the 12gb of RAM that screw the whole plan. x)

Wow so they did optimize nothing .

Автор сообщения: Montanha

Interesting to see that the some of the most currently used cards can't meet these requirements:
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

Which is actually 37.1% of the top 10 cards in use (16.52% / 44.52%) that won't be able to play the game properly (lower than recommended). Still less than half but nearly 4/10 is not a small figure. A pity to say the least.

Автор сообщения: Dolphin Bottlenose

Автор сообщения: Scorp18

Can someone from the Dev team (if they read this anyway) define on what quality min and recommended specs mean?

From their specs FAQ:

EXPECTED PERFORMANCE

Our minimum requirements aim to produce a minimum of 30 frames-per-second at 720p (1280x720).

Our recommended requirements aim to produce an average of 60 frames-per-second at 1080p (1920x1080). This may fluctuate in more intensive areas and on planets (Horizons-only)

Thank you very much for helping me my friend. Really appreciated! Still if the devs would mention the gfx quality in these settings would be good!

Автор сообщения: LazyMacro

Well what can i say... a brand new dlc for a 5 year old game wich never came out of its development phase. First you released Horizons (Which is now completely included in the vannila game - WOW what a kick in the face) with a lot of promises. Now you are going to release what?.I porbally will wait untill your next DLC so this one is going to be included too or a better idea i will never play one of your games again.

wtf dude?

Автор сообщения: Yul

Wow so they did optimize nothing .

better graphics
same hardware

good enough :D

Don't worry, 2 Gb VRAM will be enough.