Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Could so-called elite explorers make it to the far end of the Andromeda galaxy and come back to the Milky Way in one piece?
Distance to beagle point, about 65,000 ly?
Distance to Andromeda Galaxy: 2,500,000 ly
I feel that fuel scooping is going to be an issue, aside from the 28,000 jumps required in a specced-out Mandalay.
Not a chance. You need to jump to a gravity well like a star. Even with a neutron star or FSD boost, you're never going to even come close to crossing the gap between galaxies. Your carrier couldn't do it either, not even close.
Wormhole technology has allowed humanity to travel and build a space station in the outer reaches of the Andromeda galaxy. Due to the prohibitive cost of transferring resources through the wormhole (1 million credit per TON) only one station has been built.
Unfortunately, wormhole technology does not allow yet carriers to travel through the wormhole. It is up to explorers to map out, explore, and use their wit to travel to the far reaches of the Andromeda galaxy and come back in one piece.
Those are actually within range of a neutron boosted jump. The stellar streams would be interesting too. You'd get some amazing views of the milky way from those, I'm sure.
That being said, the existing galaxy is already beyond huge and we'll never explore it all, so I don't think we really need any new additions. Even if they would be cool.
Yeah but there are carriers within reach of almost every remote spot in the galaxy.
One could then say "we'll don't go on them then" but that's easier said than done when you are at 10% module health or hull strength. It's like having a McDonald's 2 miles away from the South Pole. It removes the challenge out of exploration. You don't even need an AFMU anymore because there are carriers on the way to your destination.
An untouched, pristine galaxy with no carriers around would make exploration hardcore again.
It's even less than that. Less than a tenth of a percent. Last time I saw the numbers, I think it was 0.06% of the galaxy that was explored so far. I meant it when I said that we'd never explore it all in our lifetime. Likely not in the next generation's lifetime either, if the game lives that long.
This seems like a "you" problem more so than anything, and I mean that in a respectful way. I go out into the black for months at a time and in close to 10 years of playing, I've never once visited a carrier or felt the need to.
By that logic, they should get rid of Colonia and the Colonia bridge too. Used to be, flying to Beagle Point was the ultimate test of an explorer's mettle. Now it's trivial. Even if they got rid of carriers, it would still be less of a challenge now than it used to be simply because there are places to stop along the way.
Hi! (I love Colonia btw. It's my permanent home
It's definitely a problem for me and I suspect it's also a problem for quite a few of those who enjoy the (or what I consider the) challenging bits of exploration. With colonization coming up (which I think is a great idea and something I intensely look forward to btw), I'm afraid it will make exploration even more trivial.
I kind of miss the days of carefully planning ahead, putting on multiple AFMUs, a repair limpet module...etc and not knowing for certain whether I would make it back in one piece. I miss that thrill.