Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks for the contribution.
Lmao
Calling anyone an a$$hat that has probably poured thousands of hours into something that a lot of people (obviously not you) enjoy and think is pretty decent for a space sim/flight sim, etc, is kind of an a$$hole move. Utter garbage? No. Not so much. I'm by far not a fanboy of how the next expansion played out with pricing, etc, but I'm not going to pour a lot of discontent into something that isn't going to play out how I want anyway.
We "get it". You obviously don't like the game, etc. You had 2 hours to try it out, play it, whatever, on Steam and then, if you didn't like it, get a total refund. That's an applicable avenue to approach. However, what you're doing just makes you look like a bigger ♥♥♥♥ because of how you approached it. There really is a lot to do in-game for what kind of game it is. It's not a FPS, it's not a strategy game, it's not something that a lot of people get into. That's why the whole space sim/flight sim games don't really get a whole lot of love or development time. It's a niche gaming area.
Also, complaining these developers don't offer their "new" game on Steam is beyond ridiculous. If they did, which you don't obviously approve of anyway, what exactly is that going to do to you, personally? So what if they don't, if they do, whatever. Not every game developer offers their newer, in alpha, games on Steam. PLENTY of developers have their games available for offer only on their website for right now. One that immediately comes to mind was Serpent in the Staglands. It hadn't appeared on GoG or on Steam yet but you could assuredly buy the game on their website and play the alpha, beta, etc. Another game that immediately comes to mind is, guess which one? Elite. It was ONLY available on their website initially. I bought into it when it was. Got to play alpha, beta, etc. Way before it came to Steam. I'm sure at some point their new game will come to Steam in some form or another. They'd be dumb not to offer it just because of the basic publicity it may or may not get.
Also, as a last point, go check out Raven, or whatever they call it now. The newer game from Pirranha Bytes that was a ridiculous fiasco on Steam. While I completely agree with you on what happened with the new expansion and that they could have and should have done it better, in the end, it's not the end of the world. The game has consistently gotten better and better and I don't see them stopping providing a good experience for those that enjoy such an experience. Like anyone else, the developers will probably make mistakes from time to time. They're human. I, personally, like the game. Granted, launching through Steam is a pain in the A$$ sometimes, but sometimes these things happen with the Steam launcher, etc.
Didn't mean to get so wordy, but when I saw your post, while I agreed with you on some points, it doesn't mean you should personally attack someone for the hard work they've poured their life into for years.
Troll.
Let me say one thing real quick that'll boggle your mind: the mixed reviews aren't deserved.
Planet Coaster was a thing a year ago.
A game does not have to be on steam to get good or bad reviews.
They (Frontier) also offer refunds on some of their products.
Elite: Dangerous at kickstarter was explained to be a game cut up into many seasons spanning 10-ish years of active development.
Elite: Dangerous explained that they would be 'seasons' in which if you bought the current season, you'd not have to buy the previous ones (actually a pretty awesome pricing model, if you ask me).
Frontier got numerous complaints about confusion with the games, and how many were buying both Elite: Dangerous, AND Elite: Dangerous Horizons.
Frontier then changed the purchasing model to a more familiar layout, which is what we have now. They did this because they listened to their customers, and they acted on them, giving them what they asked for.
Frontier has released Horizons, which is (programing wise) a HUGE job. And, they aren't even done with the season yet. There will be about 5 times as much content that comes with the season as there is now at the end of the season.
If you want to yell at anyone for giving E:D a new page with no reviews, yell at Steam! It's their problem, not FDevs
Season 1-3 (maybe even 4) are foundation seasons. Marking the areas in which things will be done (such as atmospheric planets, and even life), with more 'structural' updates, such as the basic SRV, and non-atmospheric landings.
I think that FDev doesn't deserve anything less than a "Very Good" review of their game; because that's what we're reviewing, their game.
Now, I feel like the pricing model could get some work, but the pricing has already gone down, as well as changed to what gamers are more familiar with. That's a hell of a lot more than you'll get from ANY other big AAA game company.
Now shut the ♥♥♥♥ up with your worthless piece of ♥♥♥♥ drabble, already!!
I'd say "Don't go full-♥♥♥♥♥♥", but you've already done it anyway.
Dont worry, i didnt pay 75 dollars to test a 30 dollar game.
As such, this discussion is not going to go anywhere good. Closing.