Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ah, i see :) Thank you kindly CMDR :)
I think you are confusing classes and ratings. The numbers denote the class, while the letters denote rating. Performance increases both with class and rating, but ships can only fit modules up to a certain class (i.e. size).
This is false, since the Sidewinder also has class 2 compartements.
- what i meant is, that a sidewinder is simply to small to fit "bigger size" modules so it does not have the slots for it due its limitations. i wasnt specifically referring to it only able to fit "1" modules. just for comparison and a ...rough explanation about the meaning behind the numbers.
my bad.
Never take a core module undersized, unless you know what you are doing.
There were a lot of people complaining "I cannot jump. It sais 'Not enough fuel'"... well. In the end it turns out they bought a new FSD, it was a better grade, but undersized. So they could not jump anywhere anymore. It's like if you fit a ferrari instead of a naturally aspirated V8 with a Golf GTI I4 Turbo engine. Yes, the GTI engine is nice, but undersized for the Ferrari....
The only reason to take undersized core internals is to save weight. So it's mostly only viable for an exploration ship... or maybe for some ships it makes sense to take a smaller powerplant since you don't need that much power.