安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
OS: Windows 7/8/10 64-bit
Processor: Quad Core CPU (4 x 2Ghz)
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia GTX 470/ATI 7240HD
DirectX: Version 11
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Storage: 25 GB available space
Also, your integraded GPU doesn't have dedicated memory and thus taps into you 8 GB or main memory. It's slower than dedicated memory, and also limits available memory for the rest of the system. And well, it's not a killer GPU to start with...
Simply put, you may be able to play the game, but chances are you won't, and even if you can launch it, it's gonna be a very frustrating experience...
I'm on an I5 4460, 8GB RAM, and an 8GB RX580 and I even push past the line sometimes. They say 6GB Ram is minimum, but after playing on-and-off for almost 5 years, I'd say the minimum RAM should be 16GB if you don't have a modern CPU+GPU combo, because right now my RAM seems to be my bottleneck.
And it all honesty, why are you trying to legitimately try any game on integrated graphics? That's really only good for low qual. games like Minecraft and mostly for generic computer use (YouTube, facebook, HTPCs, etc).
^^ Oh, please do ignore this tripe. You do not need a "minimum" 16 GB of RAM *at all.*
Still, I would strongly advise against trying to run this on integrated graphics. My wife did for the longest time, and I have no idea how she put up with it. I mean, it did technically *run,* but it did so at a terrifically puke-tastic frame rate. Something like 15-20 fps. Now, that was on a CPU with an older iGPU than yours... I think it was an HD 4400. So there's a *chance* yours is better in the graphics department. But yeah, if you're dual-core, I'd say that's a no-go.
The minimum RAM requirement is stated to be 6 GBs of RAM. My old computer can run the game with 4.
You can get a laptop capable of running Elite Dangerous in its current state for about two to three hundred bucks, if you know what to look for. But I wouldn't recommend trying on yours considering the CPU limitation. That little thing won't be able to push a decent frame rate, and it'll go supernova trying.
I was speaking from experience. I have 8GB of RAM, but I'll peak RAM usage before I ramp up my CPU, meaning I could OBVIOUSLY use more RAM for this game. And it's a lot less of an upgrade both in cost and labor to perform the upgrade, to upgrade you're ram than it is to do so with a CPU or GPU. Even general consumer level PCs are starting to come with 16GB from factory, it'd be a good QoL upgrade for your PC in the long run. And I even said, if you do not have a modern CPU+GPU combo, it'll certainly create a little buffer zone before overloading the CPU. Third, do you really need to automatically turn to derogatory name calling for someone just stating his opinion based on his experiences? It's really unwarranted. If he IS going to try gaming from integrated graphics, he damn well COULD use more RAM than a standard computer, because the RAM is SHARED with the iGPU in order to create his system's "video memory".
OP's rig is obviously a laptop. An old one. They don't need to upgrade their RAM, they need a new rig. Upgrading a several years old, non gaming laptop to run the game would be a complete waste of money.
Also, what matters is not a zillion GB of RAM, or a killer CPU or whatever, it's a proper balance of all. A non balanced rig will have a bottleneck somewhere, and it will suck. Or rather, it will only be as good as whatever component is bottlenecking it.
So, OP, if you dare, try running the game. It might work. Most likely, if it works, it will be a terrible bad experience, but it may help you figure if you want to invest some money into a new machine.
This is not bad advice, considering you have a two-hour refund window (supposedly). If the game doesn't run at all, or runs very poorly, you can exit gracefully. Moreover, you can determine if this is the kind of experience you feel you'd like to buy a new computer for.
Alternatively, I recommend Evochron Legacy. It's a fantastic space sim capable of running well on a wide variety of hardware configurations.
This was the closest "benchmark" I could find. It's essentially the same GPU with a slightly higher clock. Probably the more important thing to note however is, this is a 6700K CPU which is going to make quite a significant difference.
With some astute searching, you can find a really old demo too.
Yes. She actually played the game this way. She's a nut.
Keep in mind, this is also with 16GB of RAM. System memory is shared with integrated graphics to create more faux v-ram. This is about equal peformance to my old 2GB GTX 960, which isn't necessarily bad. 40-ish FPS is certainly playable but I reckon he won't hit anywhere near that , probably in the high teens to mid 20s between his less than lack-luster CPU, half the RAM, and slower clock speeds. Not really a good example, but we know it's at least playable on machines with about twice the performance of the OPs.
I second that with one grain of salt. Evochron is fairly enjoyable, and certainly worth looking into... But only if you use a qwerty keyboard, or intend to not use a keyboard at all.
Havinf played Evochron Mercenary for a while, I was put off by the way the game registers key mappings. I do play on an azerty keyboard, and sure, the game maps the keys properly... But in the option, it still displays them as they would be on a qwerty keyboard.
So, when you're looking for "what the heck is that function bound to, already ?" in the options, you either need to know qwerty layout by heart or alt-tab to a picture of one. I've asked the game dev if that annoyance still exists in Legacy, and it does. He didn't seem to care much either, as there are workarounds, but they are really not intuitive. In the end, he missed a sale, as I really couldn't be arsed with that.
So, Evochron, yes, but careful what you play it with.