Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
It's not an "offender". It's just a good ship.
1. And just why is it not the answer?
2. Nerfing is also "power creep", because power is always relative.
Who said anything about EVERY other ship? The issue was with Mamba being positioned as an alternative to FDL, but failing at that, therefore possibly needing a buff.
Saying that every ship should be the equal of the best medium fighter in game is just ludicrous. Let's then make every ship cost as much as a Sidewinder, get rid of rank requirements, and enjoy
The FDL has already been nerfed once. And there is absolutely no reason to lobby for nerfing ANY ship. That would only decrease gameplay enjoyment and quality of life.
Yeah right. Dream on dude.
Oh LOL, here's the real salt mine. As anticipated.
1. Playing in Open at a CG and being killed by an enemy is not "ganked". It is normal and expected gameplay. Don't want to PVP, don't play in Open near hot spots like Community goals.
2. Just because PVPers favor this ship doesn't mean that nerfing it will solve your salt problem. Since the problem is not with the ship, but with the simple fact you can't hold your own in PVP, and thus would be "ganked" regardless of ships flown.
Yeah, for about 5 seconds. After which the PVPers will switch to next best ship, and the wheel would turn once again.
Hmm, condescending much? All players matter. And PVP players do much more for theorycrafting and practical skill progress in Elite than the guys who whine about getting "ganked" in Open.
1. Because that makes for 20+ minute fights that are as exciting as watching paint dry.
2. No, it is exactly the opposite, dialing back on the powercreep.
You see, the Mamba would be pretty good ship as it is, it actually has DRAWBACKS and is demanding to fly, as it should be with every ship.
Sure needs a small buff here and there, but nothing like the sledgehammer that would be required to make it competetive to the FDL.
The FDL needs to be more in line with the Mamba, not the other way around.
I'm not condescending, I'm just being realistic and keeping my overinflated e-peen in check.
Be real mate, the players that matter are the players that foot the bill, and that's not me or you, it's the guys that are happily blasting NPCs or asteroids to unwind, and get angry when someone interferes.
Because they are, like it or not, the overwhelming majority.
But hey, feel free to prove me wrong. Show me what FDev has actually done to provide meaningful PVP gameplay in the past, and what exciting new developments they have planned to provide more meaningful PVP gameplay in the future.
It depends on the weapons, but I've been really impressed so far. I'm running a ballistic-heavy build with a G5 Charge-Enhanced distrib, and having absolutely no trouble with sustained fire. I'm emptying mags long before I'm out of cap, even at two pips.
Have you even owned a combat worthy FDL before, or are you just blowharding here because it certainly is posessed of its own drawbacks when it comes to usage..
I mean, it can't jump for heck and the fuel tank is tiny (to the point that unless you swap modules it's often easier to ship the thing between systems rather than actually fly it and a long flight in CZ or REZ will see you eating into it pretty heavily, especially if you have certain plas modifications), the drift is so far removed from the flight characteristics of anything else in the game that it has to be played in its own way and outside of shield tanking the thing actually doesn't last that long in any combat scenario. There's also the offset pilot seat which has to be worked with, lack of any fighter bay, large rebuy for the total investment needed to build the sucker to any decent degree and the fact that unlike some other options for a REZ site or CZ combat ship it has zero cargo with very little room to change that, so can't really be used to snag anything useful, it's literally only good for swatting other ships with.
If you don't like it that's fine, but don't try to convince people to ♥♥♥♥ on something that's been a combat staple for years for that reasoning. It's like those people that were arguing that the T6 is broken because the T7 doesn't have the manouverability or jump range to compete. But wait, didn't they buff the T7 instead of crapping on the T6 this year?