Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Domb question follows.
If I have three sets of heat sinks and have heat sinks set to button 5 on the throttle, all the heatsinks even though they are in the different slots will automatically be used by button 5 right?
I am new to heat sinks, never carried any really.
heat sinks, unlike other similar modules will fire 1 at a time. even if theyre all active and bound to the same button.
I do it all the time fighting goids with 4 gauss guns.
also theres a relatively cheap mod that gives you 1 extra shot for your heat sink launcher for extra weight. in some ships its wort it.... on others you can go lightweight and carry 4 heat sink launchers that weigh less than 1 standard one.
That time lost cost me a 10.4 million cr passenegr as he bailed as I was touching down on the pad at the arrival station (see my thread about it).
But I was able to turn in the others, includine the 10mil cr mission of the wanted passenger.
As this is just a passenger Anacond, and the missions come a lot faster when you accept the wanted and secretives I am going to remove the shield boosters and keep a chaff, and fill the rest of the utility slots with heat sinks, so I can silent run from/to all stations when I have wanted, or secretive passengers.
I got 4 in solo when I first signed on, then the last 3 when I flipped to private, in 5 minutes I had 50 mil cr worth of VIP's, that was fast.
I shall resist the temtaion of taking any more missions tonight and will get the extra services on my cellphone in the morning so I can use it as a mobile hotspoty if it haPPENS AGAIN.
i AHVE DONE IT BEFORE AND IT WORKS IN A PICH AND SAVES YOUR CREDITS AND REP.
Sorry for the caps.
i have been running crims A-B for weeks now because i can't be bothered B-flipping
no boosting, am using DC and po-po have not scanned me once
i have had only 1 loss to a scan caused by a BH who poped in at station and managed to scan me just before mailslot entry and that is it
Thats why I got so mad when I made the video of myself enetering jemison at 144 and not being scanned and everybody was like "You are allied there, this is crap and stupid, it won't work everywhere, blah blah!!!"
I was just on my way, dedcided to hit Fraps and record and was flayed for it.
They were saying to make another one at another station.
I felt that if they questioned my veracity on the matter I would not waste my time with them.
I am going to do something. Be back shortly.
i do fly nice steady patterns that mimic the NPC pattern
doing that seemed to fix the times i was being scanned beforehand
I was not talking toward you, I just thought of the bad comments on making a helpful video and it made me salty, I am sorry for the way it looked.
I'm also interdicted on the way there a LOT less now - though I'm not sure how much the release of 3.0 has to do with this.
Personally, I never boost, nor do I use heat sinks. I probably don't use heat sinks *because* I don't boost (boosting raises ship temperature).
I do use silent running. I make sure all my passenger ships are fully A-rated - they run cooler like this, and take longer to heat up during silent running. I have *MORE* than enough time from activating silent running to get into a station, without boosting and without reckless flying.
and i see alot of things that increase heat and thermal load
for instance everybody wants dirty thrusters to go faster, but would clean thrusters be a much better pick in regards to what we are talking about?