Elite Dangerous

Elite Dangerous

imdavidfindley (Udelukket) 22. maj 2019 kl. 17:38
FDL and FAS too good . need balance.
these medium combat ships out-gun the smaller ships and have virtually the same maneuverability rating, making anyone driving a viper or cobra or DBS basically look stupid.

the price-tag is meaningless considering how easy it is to make money, so doesn't really qualify as a balancing factor.

I'd like to see a slight drop in their maneuverability, 1-2 points, to put them in-between the large-class ships, and to make the smaller ships slightly more viable.

...
< >
Viser 1-15 af 22 kommentarer
d[-_-]b (Udelukket) 22. maj 2019 kl. 17:46 
Here you go: https://careers.frontier.co.uk/e/careers/search/new Game Designer (Technical)

Kevlar 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:08 
Oprindeligt skrevet af imdavidfindley:
these medium combat ships out-gun the smaller ships and have virtually the same maneuverability rating, making anyone driving a viper or cobra or DBS basically look stupid.

the price-tag is meaningless considering how easy it is to make money, so doesn't really qualify as a balancing factor.

I'd like to see a slight drop in their maneuverability, 1-2 points, to put them in-between the large-class ships, and to make the smaller ships slightly more viable.

...


the reason small ships are not viable has nothing to do with agility of medium ones.
Small ships were viable the way things were until:
1- incendiary rounds were nerfed, what reduced the ability of small ships to pack weapons that were efficient vs shields and hull
2- engineering come around, allowing hull to be modified to gain resistances

and this one was the deal breaker,

3- severe armor piercing penalties were applied to the size of the weapon vs the hull hardiness value (HHV for short) of the target , There are a few exceptions, with some weapons punching above their weight class, but generally small ships do not have the hardpoints to take advantage of that.

just so you can understand what that means, any ship with an HHV greater than 20 will take reduced damage from small weapons. Greater than 35 will resisted small and medium weapons and with more than 50 will resist all three. And this before hull resists are factored,

Since there is no medium or large ship with less than 35 ( in fact only one medium has 35, the type 6 while all others have 40+) , a small ship fighting a medium one will suffer a dmg penalty of almost 33 percent, on most of his weapons, and of 66 vs a large one, with the damage being then decreased by resistances

As example: an asp scout, has HHV of 52. a small overcharged MC does 2.9 dmg at best per shot. and so after you start going after the hull that MC is now only doing slight less than 2 dmg per shot. you add resistance to the mixture, lets say a low value of 25%, and you are now doing less than 1.5 per shot. so 50% of your dmg is gone. if instead of an asp , we consider an anaconda,,, think you get the picture.

if to all of that you add small power distributors, and engineering of hulls and hull reinforcements, even if medium ships were "nerfed" in terms of agility, small ships would not be necessarily viable to the extent you wish.
Paradox 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:16 
Have you even tried the vulture?
Gralzeim 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:20 
"Maneuverability rating" is just a rough indicator of how nimble a ship might be, mostly so that no one has any delusions of turning a Type 9 on a dime, or something like that.

It's more complex than a simple number. Things like mass, thruster output on each rotation axis, lateral thrusters, and more, all contribute to combat effectiveness.

And cost does still play a part in balance, because it's not like a new player starts the game with 999 billion credits.
ProLeetNoob 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:24 
You are mad that a 40 million credit medium ship outperforms a small class ship worth a fraction of the price? Shocking.
Sidst redigeret af ProLeetNoob; 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:25
imdavidfindley (Udelukket) 22. maj 2019 kl. 19:43 
ye I dont like the vulture. ...I'm playing something else much better. ....I HAD TO BETRAY MY DEDICATION TO MY EAGLE... because it can't put a dent in anything...
Dolphin Bottlenose 22. maj 2019 kl. 20:19 
Oprindeligt skrevet af imdavidfindley:
I HAD TO BETRAY MY DEDICATION TO MY EAGLE... because it can't put a dent in anything...
Small ships are weaker than medium ships. Know whom you can mess with, while flying one.

Attacking an FDL in an Eagle requires a lot of skills and knowledges how to equip it right. If you can't do it yet, it doesn't mean that FDLs should be dumbed down.
caaront (Udelukket) 22. maj 2019 kl. 20:26 
Do you expect Chevrolet to balance a Corvette because it easily beats a Cruze, or for Toyota to nerf a GT86 because it leaves a Yaris behind?

You get what you pay for, you upgrade to something better.

If they nerf everything so the beginners are even with the veterans who have many more hours invested what is the point of even playing the game?
DuDun 23. maj 2019 kl. 21:25 
Oprindeligt skrevet af caaront:
Do you expect Chevrolet to balance a Corvette because it easily beats a Cruze, or for Toyota to nerf a GT86 because it leaves a Yaris behind?

You get what you pay for, you upgrade to something better.

If they nerf everything so the beginners are even with the veterans who have many more hours invested what is the point of even playing the game?
Better pilot should win, allways. it's a space simulator, not a tier simulator.
Sidst redigeret af DuDun; 23. maj 2019 kl. 21:25
Boomer 23. maj 2019 kl. 21:40 
The Vulture and even the Imperial Courier will muscle up with larger ships.
tomg2012 23. maj 2019 kl. 21:40 
How many eagles would it take to bring down a FDL?
Dolphin Bottlenose 23. maj 2019 kl. 23:07 
Oprindeligt skrevet af tomg2012:
How many eagles would it take to bring down a FDL?
Three. :)

One to dance around, drawing attention. Two to railgun the FDL.
Sidst redigeret af Dolphin Bottlenose; 23. maj 2019 kl. 23:07
ReeNoiP 24. maj 2019 kl. 0:26 
Oprindeligt skrevet af DuDun:
Oprindeligt skrevet af caaront:
Do you expect Chevrolet to balance a Corvette because it easily beats a Cruze, or for Toyota to nerf a GT86 because it leaves a Yaris behind?

You get what you pay for, you upgrade to something better.

If they nerf everything so the beginners are even with the veterans who have many more hours invested what is the point of even playing the game?
Better pilot should win, allways. it's a space simulator, not a tier simulator.
What you are describing is not a simulator, but more like a artificially balanced multiplayer game.

Quality of the ship should definitely be very important in a simulator. Life isn't fair.

The guy in the M1 tank has an advantage over the guy on a motorcycle holding a smg.
Chro (Udelukket) 24. maj 2019 kl. 1:31 
cant fly properly, blame the "game balance"

leems segit :lunar2019laughingpig:
Laurreth 24. maj 2019 kl. 1:47 
The FDL is supposed to be an apex predator, so that's working as intended or it may even be too weak I'd say.
< >
Viser 1-15 af 22 kommentarer
Per side: 1530 50

Dato opslået: 22. maj 2019 kl. 17:38
Indlæg: 22