Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
http://youtu.be/N2UVco1S6aI
Are you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ crazy? It says RIGHT THERE: "GPU: GTX 780m SLI"
The Iris Pro 5200 HD is a secondary discreet GPU that comes together with the CPU and that doesn't get utilized at all.
an official promo test:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLIpIcZfDs0
and the gigabyte guy is legit, he doesn't talk garbage and doesn't overpromote it for stuff it is not meant for.
For this small form factor, the only thing you can discuss here is the price for the device, the performance is there for what is promotes.
The Intel Iris Pro 5200 is indeed a rather pityable graphics chip. For example if you look at a comparison of it vs. a baseline GTX 680 (which is nowadays the absolute minimum you need to play any modern game with decent graphical quality) at videocardbenchmark.net, you'll notice that the Intel chip gets a benchmark score of 1191, while the GTX 680 gets a score of 5715.
In other words, a game with graphical settings that would barely run at 60 FPS with a GTX 680, will run at about 12 FPS with the Intel chip. That's beyond unacceptable.
The GTX 750Ti may be cheaper than eg. the GTX 770, but if you are a gamer buying a new gaming PC, I really think that you shouldn't be content with the former, as it's quite slower. If you try to run many modern graphically-heavy games with it, you'll find that you will have to lower the graphical settings of the game to get decent framerates. (Even the 770, which is still pretty decent even with modern games, is starting to slowly become a bit old, at least if you really want good graphical quality in the newest games. It's not bad at all, at least not at this moment, but if you want for your card to last for more than just a couple of years, then perhaps something faster would be in place. Definitely not something slower.)
i brought gtx750ti year ago for less money than cost now lol (in local stores)
680-770 cost 2 - 2.5x more .no reason buy that (performance X prize is bad)
LOL maybe for movies, talk about deceptive marketing. I used to think Gigabyte was a decent brand but integrated Intel graphics on a gaming machine? and then saying is 4K?? LOL what ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥! I will stay away from Gigabyte from now on