ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
actually, long count makes more sense. in fact, afaic, short count is simply wrong.
"bi" means two, right? tri means three etc. and in the long count, "billion" simply means 1,000,000^2 and trillion means 1,000,000^3. etc.
oddly, Americans did just that, learning a new system, but for the opposite reason: just to ♥♥♥♥ up the logic. and then the British stupidly followed their example.
oh, Americans...
With the short scale I personally can calculate the correct number way easier. x = Latin words in numbers, +1, *3 => 10^x
and you don't generally need the -iards. go from 1 to 999999, then from 1 to 999999 million, then from 1 to 999999 billion etc. that's consistency.
"billiard" would simply mean the same as "k billion". or, as if "ard" means "and a half" (1 billiard in long count is 1 million ^2.5)
you can't call something two if it's not somehow twice something else. one quadrillion being 5 powers of one thousand is confusing.
But it's just a personal preference. Although I learned the long scale at school and I use it here in reallife when it comes to such big numbers, I'm more familiar with the short scale when it comes to games like these.
Don't know what you mean with twice something else.
ok you wouldn't actually say "thousand million" unless you're into politics and wanna make sure everyone apreciates just how big the number is.
but as i just edited in, billiard means 2.5 powers of million.
23^2.5
3(23+1)
Which was easier?
It's habbening!
It's nonsensical to say short scale is "simply wrong". They're two different systems for naming numbers; you can't say one is "wrong" by the standards of the other. That's like saying it's illegal to drive on the left in the UK because in the US, we drive on the right. Well, no; you determine what side of the road to drive on by using the context of which country you're in.
You're correct in saying that in the long scale, the numerical prefixes count the number of powers of a million. Meanwhile, in the short scale, the numerical prefixes count the number of powers of a thousand, starting with a million as the base.
Both systems are internally consistent, but short scale has the clear advantage in that almost no one uses the long scale anymore, even in countries that historically preferred it.
For purposes of playing the game, you really don't need to be able to convert in your head how many zeroes are in a duovigintillion. All you need to know is that duovigintillion is 1000 times larger than unvigintillion, which is 1000 times larger than vigintillion, which is 1000 times larger than novemdecillion, and so forth; since at any given time, all your investments are probably within just a few orders of magnitude of each other.
Long scale is easy, it is just based on millions of millions instead of thousands of millions, so you can quickly work out that sextillion is going to have 6x6 zeroes, octillion is 8x6 zeroes, etc., whereas octillion in short scale is 8x3+3 zeroes which isn't quite as straightforward.
I still use short scale because I speak english (british), but the long scale is the more sensible version.
That being said you don't need to know exactly how big the numbers if you know how they relate to eachother, as cz said above me.