Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Bulbdog would be high on my list...and yes, I know I'll likely have to swiftly build myself a fort to defend from the incoming onslaught after saying that. But I've never been a fan of dogs like that (pugs etc) with their bulbous eyes and squashed, flat faces. And the bulbdog has similar features.
Mesopithicus...not a fan of monkeys in general, but at least the giganto looks better after it's TLC. Meso, though, really needs it.
Plessie - the model of the body is cool, but that face is the stuff of nightmares.
Then there's a few creatures which aren't quite on the same level as the ones above, but still are a bit ugly in my eyes, like the daedon, pego, ravager, roll rat, nameless, etc.
And of course, not forgetting the ugliest creature in the whole of Ark ever - Humans.
Side note: can we also have a quick mention of the creatures which are really ugly, but in a cool way, so we like them even though they look nasty? The karkinos fits into that catagory for me, as does the angler, dunkleosteus, mantis and deathworm.
Pegomastax is fugly.
Pego gets my vote for fugly though
My sympathies, it's a pain when a phobia or the like stops you from playing a game that looks really good or has other things in it that you really enjoy. I'm not sure why Ark's spiders don't seem to catch me so much...oddly enough I find Minecraft's spiders to be much more unnerving, despite their incredibly blocky appearance when compared to Ark. The Human mind is an odd place.
It'd be nice, but in all fairness I don't think it'd be workable. Think how many phobias there are out there. Colour blindness has a few select forms, which can be catered for. But if a dev were to try and account for a phobia, they'd have to do it for every one out there.
For instance pogonophobia, fear of beards - no Ark character could grow facial hair. Or thalassophobia, fear of the ocean - Ark would have to be entirely land based, with no water sections at all. If game devs had to account for that last one, then games entirely based on the ocean such as Subnautica or Raft simply couldn't exist.
Spiders are meant to be scary, that's why Devs don't usually change them for something else. (Conan is the only game I've played that has had that option and then I think It's for single player mode, or personal servers only.)
The Spiders give me the creeps however the Pego is really ugly.
There are a lot of phobias for sure but arachnophobia is the most common and on par in numbers with color blindness is why I brought it up. Personally I dont care if people with a disablity or a mental disorder can play a game or not. My mind was thinking more about all the pats on the back the gamming industry was giving itself when color blind options first became a thing and that I would have expected someone to want to recreate that again.
Does it count if I say pegos are ugliest again? They are super gross.
Wurm has an arachnophobia option. It simply changes the spiders model to a blob type creature locally. This could be implemented in Ark too, only the player with the option turned on would see the different model.