"Battle for the strait" is just annoying

[Nick]

The "Battle for the strait" situation is just annoying as castille. It take 100 years to get to -100 influence to vassalize Granada, but what's more likely is that you somehow loose Granada as a tributary locking you permanently out of winning the situation. Now you have to wait for a bazillion years until you can conquer them.
Just let me conquer Granada if I loose them. Stop forcing me to sit on my ass doing nothing and loosing one cabinetmember for an eternity.

[tonypa]

I agree, not enjoying the Castile part at all.

[Nick]

I rather have not the DLC or dont play in Iberia than playaing with that situation

[tonypa]

Maybe its better for Morocco or Granada?

[eaerion]

It is only slowing everything down and occupying one of your cabinet members. It is quicker to cancel tributary, conquer and release them as a vassal than to wait for -100 influence. I'm not sure if golden era modifiers are worth it. Yet to see.

[ABoxFullOfKittens]

"Battle for the strait" is just annoying

That's what Pete Hegseth said..

[Matze3]

Yes golden era modifiers justify going through the Battle for the strait.
I don't want to spoiler, but if you play your cards right the modifiers are really nice and useful even late game.
For those interested:
There is instant colonisation, a building for +20 colony loyalty, a really nice cb an additional governor and some more buffs