What's a big tree and what's not a big tree for dev?

[Letterit]

I'd be curious have the clear dev explanation on such deep junk hint, "close to the big tree", yeah sure close to the flower of the bush.

How the hell they achieved hide "the big tree"? l'm impatient to reveal the joke.

[Letterit]

So "the big tree" is the most idiot hint I ever seen in decades of play. It's not big tree, just a fake junk hint to pretend give one.

ACS has a big problem, not enough truly smart people led the design and QA, it's chains of low IQ decisions, sad.

[Letterit]

Few after, choose between Naoe and Yasuke, I try Yasuke for a change and 5s after so climb up to some high tower, and I can't switch back to Naoe.

Those dev are seriously non smart.

[Harris]

A big tree is like a small tree, but bigger.

[[XGS]DonkyBoY]

Yer they should have the tile size on them :) this would make things easier.

[Letterit]

Originally posted by XGSDonkyBoY:

Yer they should have the tile size on them :) this would make things easier.

So you can't see how idiot was the hint, search the big tree, but there's like 10 trees in the castle and none is bigger.

It's just a stupid non sense hint.

Just got another hint invented by some stupid people and without any QA, climb the tower, but no way it's the way to make it, ok perhaps a translation problem but still, in my language you don't climb anything if you use stairs, lol.

[sh3riff]

Originally posted by Letterit:

Those dev are seriously non smart.

You actually have to be smart to make the most aggressive and stupidest anti-player system .. but its from the other side of the coin.
They spent more time and money on psychology, monetization people than actually developing the game.

But on the other hand .. yes, they are not really smart .. street smart that is.
They jump onto "money train" like 4 years later than everyone else.
The thing is already dead, everyone made billions of dollar on it and then ubisoft comes ..
Like who spends 300 millions dollars developing PC game for 5+ years only to make it like a mobile game?
There is reason why mobile games makes a lot of money. You make them quickly, cheaply and give it for free ..
Having mobile monetization in pc paid game is really retarded. Its not like you cannot google hundred different similar cases and almost every single one of them failed. The ones which succeeded you can count with just one hand and it wasnt because of monetization.
Mobile games dont have quality, they are nuisance. ACS is nuisance too.
Coincidence? I think not.

Do you know the meme about browsers? How one is fast, says something .. and then IE 5 minutes later says the first word of the fastest browser?
Ubisoft is literally the IE on this case ..

The workers knows its not smart .. problem is the management. They are old, senile, out of touch .. they are stupid. The board should have remove them years ago. I would have start stepping on managements necks after 6 months and after 12 if no improvement, i would just cut them off. How they could not do anything for 6 years and lose billions is completely nuts. They really dont like money.
But you as a worker has no saying, meaning, no voice .. you are paid to work and do my stupid stuff and make me happy. If it buries me, well, time to update your resume :)

[Letterit]

No, i don't mean smart, I mean they was missing VERY smart people that would have quote dumb/idiot aspects and would not have llet them slip through, and for that they need lead or be in QA ans have a very high influence.