Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Don't point out inconvenient truthes.
They've always used real historical figures in the franchise but ultimately it's never been accurate.
what do you mean the game where we fight the pope in a vault over an ancient alien artifact isn't historically accurate
have you ever actually played an assassins creed game
because if you have; george washington. edward thatch. anne bonny. just to name a few.
i made a trailer park boys reference and got banned for it
Because while its fiction, the game draws inspiration from real life history and historical events, but its not enough to call it "alternative history" its basically just fiction with inspiration.
Its been like this in all AC games.. the portrayal of some "historical" characters are in some cases downright comical and that is the point.
We could take various examples... da Vinci, Socrates, Franklin and Alkibiades
No they did not.
This game also have a disclaimer. Its fiction.