Predict the steam reviews Rating

[Zusuper]

My guess is 60 - 70% (Mostly Positive) Because I think a lot of people give a bad review just because Ubisoft and when their game is crashing once in 24 Hours.

When you wander it would be nice if you describe why you thing it get this rating

[TsudaTumiko]

The first week will be positive, this because they buy a lot of early review, this also happened with dragon age

[Kitty ♡]

Probably something like 50%

[SepSlither]

It’ll get bad reviews guaranteed. A lot. Not because of the gameplay itself or the story, just because you can only be a black male or an Asian woman.

[Nistrega]

Well the game looks like ♥♥♥♥. It is also a typical ubisoft garbage. So Mostly Negative. Good riddance.

[JKDos]

Автор сообщения: Deerz

have you even tried mirage? I have never heard within the ac community that it's anywhere near bad. it did what it was supposed to do. be a spin off that took everything back to the roots and it did it well. the story was a bit weak but it was also unfocused to begin with since there was no real incentive to make the game when it comes to narrative, it hit the roots really really well with the stealth and parkour and mission structure

I don't think Mirage was a bad game, but it didn't wow me, and it felt like a step backwards in same ways. I understand though that Mirage may have originally been intended to be DLC content for Valhalla, and not a full game. Even the price point reflects this.

But you're not wrong. The game did great with Parkour and Stealth, even though I did prefer the Valhalla parkour more as it feels like almost everything in Valhalla can be climbed.

[AdahnGorion]

Автор сообщения: SepSlither

It’ll get bad reviews guaranteed. A lot. Not because of the gameplay itself or the story, just because you can only be a black male or an Asian woman.

The vast majority of reviews that are out (not user reviews ofc) don´t talk about anything of that being a negative, they talk about the Story being very bad and the gameplay simplistic and fun.

[Deerz]

Автор сообщения: JKDos

Автор сообщения: Deerz

have you even tried mirage? I have never heard within the ac community that it's anywhere near bad. it did what it was supposed to do. be a spin off that took everything back to the roots and it did it well. the story was a bit weak but it was also unfocused to begin with since there was no real incentive to make the game when it comes to narrative, it hit the roots really really well with the stealth and parkour and mission structure

I don't think Mirage was a bad game, but it didn't wow me, and it felt like a step backwards in same ways. I understand though that Mirage may have originally been intended to be DLC content for Valhalla, and not a full game. Even the price point reflects this.

But you're not wrong. The game did great with Parkour and Stealth, even though I did prefer the Valhalla parkour more as it feels like almost everything in Valhalla can be climbed.

same but it was refreshing and fun for those 20 hours it lasted

[TreborSolas]

Автор сообщения: Deerz

Автор сообщения: Zusuper

What is a grifter?

people who lie or talk about stuff in bad faith in this situation. they mostly hate the game because of Yusake since he's black.

never been about skin color its the blatant disrespect towards Japan and lying about history

[Hex: Dementia]

Автор сообщения: JKDos

Автор сообщения: Hex: Dementia

Star Wars Outlaws happening all over again. You can see all the "gaming journalists" giving 100/100 scores despite mentioning the game has flaws. This is already a big red flag and makes zero sense xD

Disagree. Outlaws was a bad game because it was made by a bad development studio. Assassin's Creed Shadows is being made by one of the Assassin's Creed teams. The one behind Odyssey.

Odyssey, 6,000 Steam players right now, 63,000 peak.
Outlaws, 1,000 Steam players right now, 3,000 peak

Trust me bro. I will once again be right on my predictions.
The game from what I saw is very mid and it has lost the last bit of assassins creed identity. You know like being stealthy and things, what made the franchise big.
Well yes, the Origins, Odysee and Valhalla also focused more on action, you still could be stealthy if you wanted.
The last AC game I played almost through was black flag, and I didn't even finish that one fully. I tried to give Origins a chance. And while I loved the setting in ancient egypt, the game was so damn boring tbh. Way too big of a map, with generic quests and activities. And once I realized Odysee and Valhalla have even bigger generic maps, I lost interest completely in the series.
Plus AC Shadows basically offended the whole country of Japan, which is not a good start xD

[Deerz]

Автор сообщения: TreborSolas

Автор сообщения: Deerz

people who lie or talk about stuff in bad faith in this situation. they mostly hate the game because of Yusake since he's black.

never been about skin color its the blatant disrespect towards Japan and lying about history

They never lied there was mistakes in the process when it comes to architecture and flags but that's about it the rest people just need to grow a pair

[Deerz]

Автор сообщения: TreborSolas

Автор сообщения: Deerz

people who lie or talk about stuff in bad faith in this situation. they mostly hate the game because of Yusake since he's black.

never been about skin color its the blatant disrespect towards Japan and lying about history

Also just check social media it says it all

[Weird, weird...]

Yeah 60-70 makes sense to me too, BUT, for different reasons. I think that it will get 60-70 strictly cause it's mediocre for a AAA game... I saw some reviews and the gameplay looks clunky af... If it gets review bombed, imo it will be more like 50%...

60-70 would be 100% fair imo (sadly).

[Zusuper]

Well currently it is at 80%. Let See how it Look today Evening