Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Yasuke served Oda Nobunaga as water boy. Yasuke was not a Samurai, but a weapon bearer. I.e. he was allowed to wear a weapon, but he was not granted the status Samurai, nor was he a nobility (which requires Japanese blood). This is a common mistake. Yasuke was basically the water boy for the real Samurai Nobunaga. This Nobunaga was the actual guy in combat while Yasuke was carrying all his stuff around and giving him water when needed. Yasuke was at these battles because his boss fought there but he didn't actually fight anyone. Nobunaga did all the fighting NOT Yasuke.
Ubisoft doesn't think Yasuke is a creation of fiction. They've very publicly defended him as a historical samurai and justified his existence in the game as such. In reality, the only source for him having that role is from a book written by a white British man, which has been roundly criticized by native Japanese scholars.
However, even if we go with him just being fiction, that gets to the question of why Ubisoft would deliberately choose to add a black character to feudal Japan. Japan was completely isolationist at that point in history, so deliberately injecting racial diversity when it didn't exist is obviously agenda driven.
Fiction: Yasuke participated in assassinations in Japan.
Is it clearer now for you?
But we know Yasuke did exist and was in Japan during the time period this game takes place in. Sure we don't completely know what he did while he was there so Ubisoft can make a fictional story based on him as a Samurai.
Trying to find the "deliberately injecting racial diversity" here as I don't see it. I don't see any proof for it. Was he put in the other games for the same reason? Still trying to understand if it was not a problem to have him as a samurai in the other games I listed then why is it a problem now?
We know he existed, but he was most likely a servant. Nobunaga treated him like a pet, taking him around to show off his black skin because Japanese people had never seen that before. There is no evidence he was ever in combat, and he was most certainly not a samurai.
Again, Japan was in an isolationist period during the time of this game, and they explicitly forbid entrance by any foreigners. There is no way they would have allowed an African to freely walk around like we see in this game. Everything pertaining to that is pure fantasy. So when we have numerous stories of actual Japanese samurais from that period that could have served as the basis for a protagonist, why would Ubisoft deliberately a choose a black one and exaggerate his role? Don't have to look hard to find the injection.
So was he injected in the other games that portrayed Yasuke as a samurai or is that a Ubisoft only thing? Still trying to find the injection or proof that is the only reason why they choose to put Yasuke in the game like that.