Assassin's Creed Shadows

Assassin's Creed Shadows

View Stats:
ARE MY SPECS GOOD FOR THIS GAME?
Hello, just want to have some feedbacks if my specs are actually good for this game to play at max quality.


Processore 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-13700KF 3.40 GHz
RAM installata 32,0 GB (31,8 GB utilizzabile)
Archiviazione 932 GB SSD Samsung SSD 870 EVO 1TB, 466 GB SSD KINGSTON SNV2S500G
Scheda grafica NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (16 GB)

Let me know if you want other info
Originally posted by Hanabi:
Originally posted by ✪Ren:
OP literally just shows his specs and wants some attention - commentators on the other hand appear to be totally braindead painting canvases of useless text ROFL
His question is valid, there are loads of non-optimized games that run like crap that take insane rigs because they are terribly made. Ubisoft also has had several games on this engine in the past that before a few patches tended to be unstable, or the complex and graphical options made even strong computers cry.

Don't be mean to someone, we live in a world where Bethesda is a thing. So anyone asking if their system can run something isn't unreasonable.
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
Caduryn Apr 19 @ 11:46am 
yes
The_Box Apr 19 @ 12:21pm 
Should be good, those specs aren't too far off from my own and the game runs flawlessly for me. Same GPU too.
should be nice to play

i got a 4090 and play with 4k max settings (+14700K with 300W Max/old bios)
DLAA around 80 FPS (still pretty smooth for 80FPS with FG)
DLSS Qual around 100 FPS (with FG)
Even DLSS Qual looks pretty nice. not 100% like DLAA but its rly good
(DLSS4 and DLAA4)

i would not play in 4k max with a 4070ti but for 1080 and 1440P it should be more then enough
Last edited by Resalius...; Apr 19 @ 12:24pm
You'll probably have to turn a few settings down a notch (It's stupid to use presets in my opinion, they are just starting points) but the difference isn't really all that noticeable when actually playing the game but what is noticeable is the gameplay is smoother. With 12 GB you should be able to max out things like textures with no loss in performance but things that rely on volumetrics (clouds, fog, etc) should be turned down a notch because the difference isn't actually noticeable but an gain you significant FPS.

If you want to use presets I suggest a console ..... Otherwise with a PC you have to do the optimizations yourself because of the vast variety of set ups and every one is a little different. What I would recommend is starting with the Very High preset and then manually set things like textures to the highest settings and if you need more performance tweak some of the heavier settings down another notch such as clouds and fog since there really isn't much of a difference in visuals for those settings but they do hit your FPS much more for very little upgrade (if any) to the graphics

I would also suggest to initially not use frame generation, tweak your graphics so you get better than 60 FPS average and then kick in frame gen. For instance I get 66 FPS with no frame gen and then 120 FPS with frame gen on. If you are getting 80 FPS with frame gen then you basic FPS are just 40 FPS which to me is noticeably laggy. 120 FPS with frame gen = about the same lag as 60 FPS. You cannot make time go backwards so lag is always going to be present based on your basic framerate which is going to be half of what it appears to be with frame gen enabled.
Last edited by longjohn119; Apr 19 @ 1:02pm
Caduryn Apr 19 @ 12:58pm 
Originally posted by longjohn119:
You'll probably have to turn a few settings down a notch (It's stupid to use presets in my opinion, they are just starting points) but the difference isn't really all that noticeable when actually playing the game but what is noticeable is the gameplay is smoother. With 12 GB you should be able to max out things like textures with no loss in performance but things that rely on volumetrics (clouds, fog, etc) should be turned down a notch because the difference isn't actually noticeable but an gain you significant FPS.

If you want to use presets I suggest a console ..... Otherwise with a PC you have to do the optimizations yourself because of the vast variety of set ups and every one is a little different. What I would recommend is starting with the Very High preset and then manually set things like textures to the highest settings and if you need more performance tweak some of the heavier settings down another notch such as clouds and fog since there really isn't much of a difference in visuals for those settings but they do hit your FPS much more for very little upgrade (if any) to the graphics
If i can play max settings 1440p he can too
I never said you couldn't play on max, only that it's not going to be very performant as learning how to tweak the settings, Personally I couldn't play with max setting because my base framerate would be well below 60 FPS and laggy as hell. If you can tolerate a base framerate of 40 FPS (80 FPS with frame gen) then fine for you but not for me. It's just going to throw off my timed parries and dodges and likely things like running assassinations where timing is important.
Thanks for all the answers, i will do my evaluations and think for the best solution.
✪Ren Apr 19 @ 3:41pm 
OP literally just shows his specs and wants some attention - commentators on the other hand appear to be totally braindead painting canvases of useless text ROFL
I have a rig with specs: i7 11700k, 32 GB Ram and RTX 5080 OC. Also I play at fullhd resolution (without FG/DLSS). Max settings (except mid ray tracing quality). As a result, the game can't show me stable 60 fps at the "cities". What a shame...
The author of this thread has indicated that this post answers the original topic.
Hanabi Apr 19 @ 7:13pm 
Originally posted by ✪Ren:
OP literally just shows his specs and wants some attention - commentators on the other hand appear to be totally braindead painting canvases of useless text ROFL
His question is valid, there are loads of non-optimized games that run like crap that take insane rigs because they are terribly made. Ubisoft also has had several games on this engine in the past that before a few patches tended to be unstable, or the complex and graphical options made even strong computers cry.

Don't be mean to someone, we live in a world where Bethesda is a thing. So anyone asking if their system can run something isn't unreasonable.
KripTed Apr 19 @ 7:17pm 
Game's poorly optimized. You'll only get 60 fps on high with native resolution at 1440p. Unless you turn on fake generation and DLSS.
Last edited by KripTed; Apr 19 @ 7:18pm
Cupcake Apr 19 @ 8:10pm 
Originally posted by KripTed:
Game's poorly optimized. You'll only get 60 fps on high with native resolution at 1440p. Unless you turn on fake generation and DLSS.

This is what I did lol

I turned on MFG 4x and I got 180-230+ fps

It’s so smooth with only 20ms input lag. Wasn’t noticeable when playing with Dualsense controller. As long as base frame rate is above 60fps. I’m very happy

Edit
I use max settings incl RT at 1440p
Last edited by Cupcake; Apr 19 @ 8:11pm
KripTed Apr 19 @ 11:28pm 
Originally posted by Cupcake:
Originally posted by KripTed:
Game's poorly optimized. You'll only get 60 fps on high with native resolution at 1440p. Unless you turn on fake generation and DLSS.

This is what I did lol

I turned on MFG 4x and I got 180-230+ fps

It’s so smooth with only 20ms input lag. Wasn’t noticeable when playing with Dualsense controller. As long as base frame rate is above 60fps. I’m very happy

Edit
I use max settings incl RT at 1440p

Which is specifically designed for the 50 series. Which yet again, like I said, is fake frames. I'm talking about native resolution here. These games are horribly optimized that we need to rely on DLSS and Fake Generation in order to get some decent performance. Even then, it's basically fake performance and everything looks ugly. I'm sorry but if I'm paying 1200-1700$ on a GPU. It should be hitting those frames at native. NVIDIA is literally the Apple of GPU's now.
Last edited by KripTed; Apr 19 @ 11:34pm
Stop being poor bro your pc sucks throw it in the garbage.
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
Per page: 1530 50