Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What is probably going to happen now is that Ubisoft will fire a few thousand people. These people will be replaced by re-hires in China and we will finally get games for chuds eh.
Ubisoft is really owning the chuds here by falling apart and needing to be rescued by Tencent
lol that's mad cope. Being that this is something I'm quite familiar with in the industry I'm just going to say. NO. This is not what they do at all, in fact we can go further than that to simply look at Tencent's record. Tencent doesn't give a care in the world about Ubisoft, what it cares about is the IPs it holds.
You also don't seem to know much about the language of the deal. Also to note successful companies generally don't do layoffs, bloated ones or unsuccessful ones do. Which is my field of expertise btw. Use of the word 'agile' should be particularly concerning.
"This new subsidiary includes the teams developing the Rainbow Six, Assassin’s Creed, and Far Cry franchises based in Montréal, Quebec, Sherbrooke, Saguenay, Barcelona, and Sofia, as well as Ubisoft’s back-catalog and any new games currently under development or to be developed. So, it sounds like existing projects are safe, and there is no word yet on more layoffs."
This explains the situation far better than whatever you wrote above:
TL;DR: This is primarily a financial move. Tencent doesn't want to buy Ubisoft; they want to buy a stake in the value of the IP Ubisoft develops. If anything goes wrong with Ubisoft, Tencent gets a direct stake in the most valuable assets, which will likely be the IP itself.
They're creating a company that holds the IP for all games. So this company (Ubisoft Neo, why not) will own the concept of an Assassin's Creed, Far Cry, Ghost Recon, etc, game. The OG Ubisoft will pay to license the game concept from Ubisoft Neo.
The benefit of this is that OG Ubisoft will be encouraged to make valuable games that bring in sales, and have a reason to develop games for older franchises since the license fee will be lower for these. Ubisoft Neo then has an incentive to make sure these games don't damage the value of the IP, so they'll ensure OG Ubisoft doesn't make a game that reduces the value of Far Cry by releasing a stinker.
The downside is that OG Ubisoft will be limited in making games that Ubisoft Neo owns. Ubisoft Neo will decide what is worth making games for, and can effectively strangle OG Ubisoft from profitability directly from game sales, and further incentivize heavy post-purchase transactions. For example, let's say Far Cry 6 made $100,000,000 profit on a $50,000,000 budget, so Neo can charge OG Ubisoft $50,000,000 to license Far Cry, and now OG Ubisoft needs to increase monetization to make any money on this new Far Cry. On top of that, Neo can decide to sell off a property for a quick profit and limit OG Ubisoft's library for new games.
This move is obviously to protect the licenses under Tencent umbrella
Took me three seconds to disprove this via an internet search:
All they did was restructure the company. Companies do this all the time.
The provisions also seems like a possibility of a take over.
This. Slowly Tencents team will take full control of the franchise and phase out the current dev team. Just like what happened to Marvel Rivals and their subsidiary US team.