Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So now I am just waiting to see what Ubisoft does.
Well at this stage there are 2 kind of reviewers.
Some "religious zealot" bent on Ubisoft obliteration. They probably don't play the game. But they hate it like their life depends on it, and are easy to spot.
And then people who play the game. Most of them are mostly happy. Though I feel for a few who have met some strange game stopper crash. And there are a few other moderately annoying nitpick. But other than it's undeniably great.
I have every reason to believe Japanese public fall in both these categories as well.
Polygon sucks by the way
In the article:
https://dengekionline.com/article/202503/36857
https://game.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/rev1/1671172.html
https://www.gamer.ne.jp/news/202503190002/
https://www.4gamer.net/games/656/G065622/20250318037/
Actually they included the source in the article. You can click on the source and it linked directly to the Japanese reviews.
You can read the actual japanese reviews if you don't trust Polygon.
If you don't trust polygon, just look at the actual japanese reviews. If you don't understand Japanese, you can try to translate it using google translate.
Other than that, the game got Very Positive on Steam from players that use Japanese language reviews.
They're a bunch of americans speaking for japanese people and complaining that an american company is speaking for japanese people. They're not actually gonna notice that unlike them the second one has sources, because in their imagination they have sources too: Probably some random guy who said he's japanese in some kind of imageboard or youtube comment, who for some reason they take as representation of "the japanese people" at the same time as they believe themselves very skeptical critical thinkers who will not take the word of any single person or news media.