Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Also thanks for proving your only problem with the game is it having a gay character.
Quit exaggerating it. The politicians were mad because shrines could be "desecrated" with destructible environments and blood splatter which, yes, is overly sensitive and dumb IMO.
I can clearly see you didn't play those games.
Julius Caesar literaly gets written off like Hanzo, and nobody cared because "Generic white dude". It's not until it's Japan that people actually cared what Assassin's Creed was doing with their stories. What about when George Washington was an actual tyrant and ruled America with an iron fist? Totally insulted my culture, man!
Historical Fiction does not mean *Accurate* fiction.
Look it up
"The first such intentional inclusion of Nuclear Gandhi was in Civilization V. Civilization V lead game designer Jon Shafer set Gandhi's "Build Nuke" and "Use Nuke" parameters to the highest possible value, 12. Shafer said that he did this as a joke:"
From the wikipedia. It was put in intentionally as a joke in Civ 5.
Also, who gives a ♥♥♥♥?
If they wanted to cast a historical figure differently then they were, in a series that doesn't really care too much about historical accuracy anyway, why is this such a big deal?
Idk it just sounds a lot like pointless ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ to me
Trump cares more about people then all Democrats together on Earth!
Yet you said nothing when they disrespected Islam in the first game, Christianity and the Pope in the second game, nearly all of America's Founding Fathers in the third game, Greek historical figures in Odyssey and Christianity again in Valhalla ...... I could go on to point out the other hypocrisies ......
Don’t try to rewrite your tone now that you’re being called out. If it really was a question, you would’ve framed it with respect, not as a jab. You weren’t inviting dialogue — you were belittling people’s pain.
Saying “if you answer it, it’s not mocking” is like insulting someone and then acting like it’s their fault for being offended. That’s not how empathy or accountability works.
It pay to use the brains rather than your emotions ;D
Honestly I doubt many of the characters are historically accurate. There's lists of historical inaccuracies in gaming and in the Assassin's Creed series and there's a lot. Games aren't known for being historically accurate and the Assassin's Creed series has deviated a lot through the entire series from history.
Hahahhaha, tell me you're a cultist without telling me you're a cultist.
I'm just not gathering why I'm supposed to care here. No one implicitly ♥♥♥♥ talked or depicted anyone in an ethically nefarious light, no one declared war, and no one aspired to say Japan isn't worth ♥♥♥♥.
You're blowing a lot of hot air right about now
The question is why has the Japanese history been dragged through the mud with this game compared to previous Assassin's Creed titles? So, should the Japanese just accept this embargo? Just imagine if Ubisoft makes an Assassin's Creed game in Africa and the main character is a white, strong, 2-meter-tall man who beat up blacks and cut their heads off, also from black womens in the game. What would happen then, worldwide hmm? lol, Clown!