Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The issues are dishonesty, laziness, hypocrisy, and the disrespect shown by how they doubled down on every problem as they came to light.
Did you just seriously ask what was offensive about Hellsing having the Catholic church be more interested in running around murdering civilians then they were in fighting Nazi vampires?
I'm 30 hours in and if I had to give a full reason, it's because the story of this one is a very personal one that needed a set character much like Ezio was needed to be himself. Having a male and female protag was always better than a gender option because each character got to be unique and have more of a hands on approach, but in this one I think that the story wouldn't have worked the same if Naoe could be gender swapped.
My dude, I have literally had to pray to about 52 shrines so far in order to progress through the game, learn how to properly take part in a tea ceremony (and pass a test based on REMEMEBERING that knowledge) as well has gotten a deep cut on lessons in honor among the Samurai class.
I'm seriously looking for the actual disrespect instead of people combing through promo material looking for the lamest possible things, almost everything of which was deeply considered on feedback and fixed or responded to as things happened. No greater respect comes than from listening and reacting to offenses by actually owning up and fixing them. And Ubisoft gets flying colors on that one.
Also said concern was about the game incidentally leading to increased tourist vandalism. The Prime Minister's response was like "yeah we need to do something about the IRL vandalism," he wasn't even talking about confronting Ubi over their game.
And even if he did mentioned Ubisoft, is a really dumb point. This is the japanese equivalent when politicians were whining that GTA was advocating to commit violence and crime
Then again there are those that just want to watch the world burn so who knows.
Then there's stuff like this.
"Accuracy denotes the extent to which a text’s representation is consistent with available evidence. It is concerned with historical veracity and whether specific aspects of an historical fiction can be considered factual. Authenticity, however, refers to an impression of accuracy and the extent to which readers believe that a representation captures the past."
"Such perceptions might be informed by historical research, yet they are not necessarily so. Authentic representations need not be accurate."
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8xwyy/a-true-story-defining-accuracy-and-authenticity-in-historical-fiction
Also you went and listed the 4th (least used) meaning of "faithful" to try and make your point and took two out. And even then you left out "to a standard", which is one of the three options there. The standard doesn't have to meet empirical fact. Which is extra ironic as faith in general is something you only apply to belief in something when you lack evidence. XD
I get one of you clowns every year in my linguistics courses and you always wonder why you fail or drop out after I'm done laughing at these completely faithless (see the irony here?) arguments.
Destroying the Japanese Shrine. That one was bad enough to be patched out because they talked about it in Japanese parliment.
Cutting down Civilians without the game over that Assassin's Creed normally gives you for that. Also its not framed as bad.
Mixing Chinese architecture in.
Yasuke wasn't a Samurai, he was in Japan for a year. The insult is saying this is historically accurate, much the same as someone revising your own history. That's just enough time to become competent in the language, let alone fluent.
Having a romance option with Nobunaga's Sister who was notoriously faithful and ancestor to the Japanese Imperial family, with children that were each famous in their own right. Imagine telling people that in this 'historically accurate game', she shacked up with some foreigner servant that was only in the country for a year.
It all starts of course with the claim that this game is at all historically accurate and citing Thomas Lockley, someone who wrote fanfiction about Yasuke, as their source.
The ability to optionally damage a shrine? Boohoo, we raided monasteries and fought the pope.
Not true. While Odyssey did not include a desync for killing civilians, Shadows does, like most of the series. There are on screen warnings not to kill civilians, to boot.
Oh noes! They got some details wrong. ...like they did with other entries in the series.
Wrong. Yasuke was a samurai, and saying he was is not disrespectful to the nation or culture of Japan.
A historical figure treated like a character in their historical fiction. Kinda makes me think of several other ACs. Liked the bit about Washington being a crazy tyrant. But, if you want to specifically go with the "historically accurate" argument, which is already dubious, not in Canon mode. So, toss that one out.